Craig Johnston
210 likes | 366 Vues
Hoops and hopes : environmental planning instruments, affordable housing, and community housing providers Notes for presentation to NSW community housing conference, Newcastle, 17 August 2006 Not for reproduction or citation. Craig Johnston. Warning.
Craig Johnston
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Hoops and hopes: environmental planning instruments, affordable housing, and community housing providersNotes for presentation to NSW community housing conference, Newcastle, 17 August 2006Not for reproduction or citation Craig Johnston
Warning • The data collection reported on in this presentation is ‘work in progress’. • Corrections and updates are very welcome! • Email craig@shelternsw.org.au
(Potential) role of local government and affordable housing • Protect • Promote • Provide – financed by development levies or other council own-sources
Activities Councils = 153 (mid 2006) Studies ≈ 18 (+ 5) Strategies (complete) ≈ 9 LEP provisions = 15 LEP in waiting = 1 Affordable housing schemes ≈ 5/6 * not including aged (social) housing
On the ground Aff-housing schemes = 5 (plus CB 1) Councils = 6 (plus W 1) Units of LG aff-housing (current) = 69 Units of LG aff-housing (pipeline) = 6 R + 15 CB CHP managing LG aff-housing = 3 * Not including aged (social) housing
Aged (social) housingself-care rental units allocated to low-income older people
‘Due process’ Needs study → Policy framework → Strategies → LEP DCP Polices and procedures for planning agreements Asset redeployment Acquisitions (build, buy, or benefit) → Keep or transfer title EOI for an affordable housing manager Contract management Property and tenancy management
Planning and development consent powers • Inclusionary zoning (s.94F/SEPP 70) • Development incentives • Planning agreements (s.93F) • SEPP 10
Planning agreements under section 93F are not the same as section 106 agreements in England!
SEPP 10 • Loss of low-rent flats, hostels, boarding houses • Does not cover loss of caravan parks, manufactured homes estates • Greater Metropolitan Region • Concurrence of MOP (DOP) • Mitigation vs compensation • Affordable housing contribution as mitigation • Condition of development consent; deed between developer and CHP
Joint ventures • Council assets (land, dwellings) – Wollongong • LGHIP projects – Cessnock, Gosford • CAH debt-equity demo projects – Willoughby, Shoalhaven
Models: Ownership/title LG retains • Willoughby • Waverley • Randwick • North Sydney • Wollongong (2) Transfer to AHM • Sydney City – Green Square Transfer to OCH • Parramatta
Models: Allocation/eligibility criteria {1} Income thresholds – social housing criteria • North Sydney (properties jointly owned by LG and DOH) • low-income • Waverley • ‘affordable’ or moderate income • Willoughby • Randwick • social housing plus moderate income • Sydney City - Green Square
Models: Allocation/eligibility criteria {2} Local link • Willoughby • Waverley • North Sydney • Randwick Other • ‘Key worker’ • Randwick • Canada Bay (6/15)
Models: Rent-setting income – 30% • Willoughby median rent in LGA • Waverley (75%)
Models: Lease periods Waverley – max 3 years
LG+CHP partnerships • Policy framework • Contract arrangements • Asset management • Transparency and accountability • Skills • Project development • Project management • Contract management
Resources • ‘Levying developers for affordable housing’ (Shelter Brief) • www.shelternsw.org.au/publications.shtml • affordable housing studies • www.shelternsw.org.au/ahn/ahn-posts.html • Affordable Housing Network NSW • www.shelternsw.org.au/ahn/ahn.html