High Impact Sales Management. …using modern approaches to dramatically increase your team’s sales performance. Profiles International. Founded 1990 700 offices in 90 countries 45 Regional Offices 45,000+ clients worldwide including:. The ‘80/20 Rule’ - Fact or Fiction?.
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation
Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement.Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien.Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.
F I N
Plus de contenu associé
Transcription de la présentation
High Impact Sales Management …using modern approaches to dramatically increase your team’s sales performance
Profiles International • Founded 1990 • 700 offices in 90 countries • 45 Regional Offices • 45,000+ clients worldwide including:
‘Normal Distribution’ These pull sales out of the organization and put pressure on everyone Bottom Performers produce 32% less than the ‘Average’ producers These take up the slack for the Bottom Performers – but are highly mobile Top Performers produce 32% more than the ‘Average’ producers Source: “The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings” Psychological Bulletin, Sept 1998, Vol. 124, No. 2, pp 262-274.
Real Life: Novartis • 45 salespeople averaged 109% of target • Top 10 averaged 125% of target (111% to 139%) • Bottom 7 averaged 92% (82% to 99%) More on this case study later…
Real Life: Data Service Organization • Just 14 Account Executives • Dramatic performance gaps • Average sales of 3 Top Performers: $1.25M • Average sales of 3 Bottom Performers: $850K More on this case study later…
About Your Team Let’s say you’ve a team of ten salespeople… …each carrying a quota of $600K
Meet Your Team • Tom $1,000,000 • Mike $1,000,000 • Tony $700,000 • Dave $700,000 • Sue $600,000 • Amy $500,000 • sherry $500,000 • John $400,000 • Charles $300,000 • Brian $300,000 • Two you call probably ‘Stars’, right? • Five you’d likely rate as ‘So-So’ • Three who’d generally qualify as ‘Passengers’
Utility Analysis – A definition “Utility analysis is a quantitative method that estimates the monetary value of benefits generated by any intervention based on the improvement it produces in worker productivity. Utility analysis provides managers information they can use to evaluate the financial impact of any intervention, including computing a return on their investment in implementing it” - Bernstein, Allen L. “A handbook of statistical solutions for the behavioral sciences”. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Utility Analysis – Assumptions Employees generate results that have monetary value to the organizations that employ them Employees differ in the degree to which they produce results even when they hold the same position and operate within like circumstances The implication is that the level of results produced by employees in their jobs have different monetary consequences for the organizations that employ them
Process Overview Rank your salespeople – top to bottom Create performance tiers Identify salespeople on each tier Identify average sales per tier Use this information to manage the business
Your Team - Ranked • Tom $1,000,000 • Mike $1,000,000 • Tony $700,000 • Dave $700,000 • Sue $600,000 • Amy $500,000 • Sherry $500,000 • John $400,000 • Charles $300,000 • Brian $300,000
Tom $1,000,000 Mike $1,000,000 Tony $700,000 Dave $700,000 Sue $600,000 Amy $500,000 sherry $500,000 John $400,000 Charles $300,000 Brian $300,000 $6,000,000 Total Sales
Assign Salespeople to Tiers Top Tier: Tom $1,000,000 Mike $1,000,000 $2,000,000 Middle Tier: Tony $700,000 Dave $700,000 Sue $600,000 $2,000,000 • Bottom Tier: • Amy $500,000 • Sherry $500,000 • John $400,000 • Charles $300,000 • Brian $300,000 • $2,000,000
Assign Salespeople to Tiers “Stars” Tom $1,000,000 Mike $1,000,000 $2,000,000 Middle Tier: Tony $700,000 Dave $700,000 Sue $600,000 $2,000,000 • Bottom Tier: • Amy $500,000 • Sherry $500,000 • John $400,000 • Charles $300,000 • Brian $300,000 • $2,000,000
Assign Salespeople to Tiers “Stars” Tom $1,000,000 Mike $1,000,000 $2,000,000 “So So” Tony $700,000 Dave $700,000 Sue $600,000 $2,000,000 • Bottom Tier: • Amy $500,000 • Sherry $500,000 • John $400,000 • Charles $300,000 • Brian $300,000 • $2,000,000
Assign Salespeople to Tiers “Stars” Tom $1,000,000 Mike $1,000,000 $2,000,000 “So So” Tony $700,000 Dave $700,000 Sue $600,000 $2,000,000 • “Passengers” • Amy $500,000 • Sherry $500,000 • John $400,000 • Charles $300,000 • Brian $300,000 • $2,000,000
Hire Star salespeople first time? Raise Passengers to So-So level? Raise So-So Performers to Star Performer level? Make sure I lose no So-So or Star Performers? “So how do I…”
360,000 salespeople followed through sales careers over 20 years “It’s not experience – or college degrees or other accepted factors… …(it) hinges on fit with the job.” Source: Herbert M. Greenberg and Jeanne Greenberg, “Job Matching for Better Sales Performance, ” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 58, No. 5.
“Six months after hire persons who had been job matched outperformed those who had not been matched. “Moreover, the differences widened after 14 months” Percentage of Top Performers in sales force – Job Match vs. Non Job Match Source: Herbert M. Greenberg and Jeanne Greenberg, “Job Matching for Better Sales Performance, ” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 58, No. 5.
Learning Index Learning, reasoning and problem solving approach 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Prefers time to think things through Deliberate approach to learning new skills Prefer a more routine sales environment Learns through experience and repetition Quickly understand client needs Fast problem solver Adapts quickly in fast moving negotiations Effective communicator of complex ideas Fast learner
Attitude Measures extent of positive outlook - of tendency to trust / expect the best of others 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Endlessly Optimistic “Don’t worry, be happy” Deal with rejection easily Relaxed social style Quick to trust Pessimistic ‘Glass Half Empty’ Challenges remaining Positive in face of rejection Suspicious & critical of others
Sociability Social Style & Approach 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Finds networking challenging Small talk doesn’t come naturally Happy in own company Keeps to oneself Naturally reserved Enjoy networking Conversational People Oriented Need social contact Comfortable in groups Everyone’s ‘new best friend’
Enterprising Interest in activities that involves persuading others, presenting ideas & plans, and negotiating/deal-making 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Little interest in entrepreneurial activities May not enjoy negotiating Recognition & status not so important Enjoys entrepreneurial climate Wants to lead Likes to persuade Interested in recognition & status Motivated by entrepreneurial activities
“...(it) hinges on fit with the job…” • Can deal with the mental demands of their sales cycle position • Are comfortable with the demands of the sales environment they work in • Enjoy selling and are motivated to do it ‘Superior’ sales producers fit their jobs and:
Hire Star salespeople first time? Raise Passengers to So-So level? Raise So-So Performers to Star Performer level? Make sure I lose no So-So or Star Performers? “So how do I…”
Connexion au compte
Connectez-vous pour publier votre contenu sur SlideServe.