1 / 12

Performance Evaluation of Municipal Councillors in Mumbai: 2014 Report Insights

This report evaluates the performance of municipal councillors in Mumbai for the period April 2013 to March 2014. It explores various aspects including attendance, the number of questions asked, and the presence of criminal records among councillors. Notably, attendance dropped by 6.7%, while the average questions asked increased significantly compared to the previous fiscal year. The analysis also highlights gender performance with equal representation in top ranks. Key observations reflect both positive trends and areas of concern, emphasizing the need for improved accountability and civic engagement.

meryle
Télécharger la présentation

Performance Evaluation of Municipal Councillors in Mumbai: 2014 Report Insights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Parameters for Rating Municipal Councillors RTI Data Source: 1 Municipal Secretary, MCGM (MCGM Head Office and BEST) and Assistant Engineer (Maintenance), MCGM (from all the 24 Administrative Wards of MCGM); 2 Election Commission Department, MCGM; 3 Mumbai Police. 4Area Development Fund relates to the period April’12 to March’14 (Rs.1.2 crores).

  2. Mumbai Report CardMunicipal Councillors 2014 Grade A – Between 100% to 80% Grade B – Less than 80% to 70% Grade C – Less than 70% to 60% Grade D – Less than 60% to 50% Grade E – Less than 50% to 35% Grade F – Less than 35% (Period under consideration – April 2013 to March 2014)

  3. TOP 10 COUNCILLORS by RANK

  4. BOTTOM 10 COUNCILLORS by RANK

  5. TOP 10 COUNCILLORS for MOVEMENT

  6. BOTTOM 10 COUNCILLORS for MOVEMENT

  7. Observations: Positive Signs • Gender Performance: • In the top 10 there are equal Female and Male Councillors • The average score of Female Councillors (59.41%) is slightly more than Male Councillors (59.4%) • Questions Asked: • 27% increase • From 2232 questions in FY 2012-13 to 2835 questions in FY 2013-14. • More than 50 questions: One Councillor in FY 2012-13 to Six Councillors in FY 2013-14. • Maximum questions: Anant Nar (91), Saeeda Khan (85) and Deepak Pawar (73). • Quality of Questions: • 3.8% increase

  8. Observations : Cause of Concern • Attendance: • Dropped by 6.7% • Questions Asked: • 10 Councillors haven’t asked a single question this year (FY 2013-14). • Three Councillors (Anita Yadav, Jyotsna Parmar, Lalita Annamalai) of them haven’t asked a single question till date (April’12 to March’14). • Proportion of questions asked compared to civic complaint's just 26.9%. • Criminal Record: • 50 Councillors have criminal record as on 31st Dec’13 • 34 Councilors had criminal cases before (2012) elections as per their affidavits • 16 Councillors have new FIRs/Chargesheets after they were elected • 5 Councillors who had criminal record as per their affidavits have new FIRs/Chargesheets • 41 (out of the 50) Councillors have been chargesheeted • Perceived Performance: • Overall perceived performance has dropped by 11.8%. • Overall accessibility has dropped by 27.7%.

  9. Overall accessibility has dropped by 27.7%

  10. Overall score has increased from 58.57% to 59.41%

  11. THANK YOU!!!

More Related