1 / 28

Geographical Indications: A Success Story of European Agriculture

Geographical Indications: A Success Story of European Agriculture Raimondo Serra , Agricultural Counsellor Delegation of the European Commission to China International Symposium on Geographical Indications jointly organized by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and

michaelae
Télécharger la présentation

Geographical Indications: A Success Story of European Agriculture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Geographical Indications: • A Success Story of European Agriculture • Raimondo Serra, Agricultural Counsellor • Delegation of the European Commission to China • International Symposium on Geographical Indications • jointly organized by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and • the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) • of the People Republic of China • Beijing, June 26 to 28, 2007

  2. Outline • Legislation in force • Basic concepts • Main figures • Why do Gis matter? • Third country applications

  3. The European Union • 27 Member States • 490 million consumers • 14 million farmers

  4. GI Legislation in the EU since 1992 The European Community adopted a “sui generis legislation on Geographical Indications” for agricultural products other than wines and spirits in 1992: Regulation (EEC) n° 2081/92 on the protection of geographical Indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs.

  5. Legislation updated in 2006 Regulation (EC) n° 510/06 • In March 2006, the EU has made the registration procedure for Protected Designations of Origin (PDOs) and Protected Geographical Indications (PGIs) more efficient and fully WTO compatible adopting Regulation (EC) n° 510/06 on the protection of Geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs

  6. SCOPE OF THE REGULATION

  7. Designation of origin (PDO) means... • the name of a region, a specific place or, in exceptional cases, a country, used to describe an agricultural product or a foodstuff: • originating in that region, specific place or country, and • the quality or characteristics of which are essentially or exclusively due to a particular geographical environment with its inherent natural and human factors, and the production, processing and preparation of which take place in the defined geographical area

  8. Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) means... • the name of a region, a specific place or, in exceptional cases, a country, used to describe an agricultural product or a foodstuff: • originating in that region, specific place or country, and • which possesses a specific quality, reputation or other characteristics attributable to that geographical origin and the productionand/orprocessingand/orpreparation of which take place in the defined geographical area

  9. Protection granted in EU Object of the protection : The registered names (not the product itself) Scope of the protection. Protected against : a) any direct or indirect commercial use of the name for comparable products or if using the name exploits the reputation of the protected name

  10. Protection granted… b) any misuse, indication or evocation, even if - the true origin is indicated - the protected name is translated - the protected name is accompanied by “type”, “method” or similar c) any other false or misleading indications as to the provenance, origin, nature or essential qualities of the product d) any other practice liable to mislead the public as to the true origin of the product

  11. Specifications • name • description of the product • definition of the geographical area • evidence that the product originates in the geographical area • method of obtaining the product • causal link with the geographical environment or origin • inspection body

  12. Example: Scotch Lamb (PGI) • Description: • The product is derived from lambs born, reared throughout their lives, slaughtered and dressed in the designated geographical area. • Geographical area: • The area is defined as the mainland of Scotland, including the islands off the west coast, Orkney and Shetland.

  13. Example: Scotch Lamb (PGI) • Method of production: • Lambs are born and reared throughout their lives in the designated geographical area. The animals will have been produced and slaughtered in accordance with quality assurance schemes accredited to European Standard EN 45011 (ISO Guide 65) and having the same standards, assessments and assessment frequencies as those set by the applicant. They are slaughtered and dressed in the designated geographical area in accordance with the specifications. • Link: • Scotch Lamb has a quality and characteristics arising from extensive grazing on the characteristic pastures of Scotland.

  14. Distribution of PDOs/PGIs in the EU(updated May 2007)

  15. Distribution by EU Member State(May 2007)

  16. Why do GIs matter? GIs are important to the future of EU agriculture: • to contribute to a reorientation towards quality as opposed to quantity; • to encourage the diversification of agricultural production; • to keep value-added in local areas • to provide producers with a higher income in return from genuine efforts to improve quality; and • to provide consumers with high quality products with the guarantee of their mode of production and origin.

  17. Why do GIs matter? GIs are important because they: • help producers to obtain a premium price for their products in exchange for guarantees offered to consumers on production methods and quality; • increase production and create local development; • allow for a better redistribution of the added value in the production chain; • bring value to the land of origin; • prevent the re-localisation of production; • encourage diversification in production, thus preserving the biodiversity, local know-how and natural resources; • have a positive impact on tourism.

  18. Comparative advantages of GI labels Friesland and Emilia Romagna cheeses compared 1,57 billion kg of milk “Bulk” model Friesland (Netherlands) “Quality” model Parmegiano Reggiano (Italy) 5,000 1,7 8,500 309 8,400 2,5 21,000 239 Numbers of farms Annual Working Unit/farm Total AWU Income/AWU Nitrogen loss/kg ha-1 << << << equal >> Source: “High quality products and regional specialties: a promising trajectory for endogenous and sustainable development”, Prof. Jan Douwe van der Ploeg, OECD, Siena, Italy, 10-12 July 2002

  19. Comparative advantages of GI labels Effect on rural areas; example of PGI ‘Volailles de Loué’ (France) 30 million broilers p. year “Bulk” model “Quality” model PGI ‘Volailles de Loué’ Numbers of farms Total Annual Working Unit Agricultural landLand management 150 500 not land-based nil 1.000 3.000 (450 in Loué) 9.500 ha grass land24.000 ha cereals 750.000 trees planted1.200 km hedges planted << << Source: Institut National des Appellations d’Origine, France 2004

  20. Third country applications While the EU’s quality designation systems have for a long time been open to producers in non-EU countries, since 31 March 2006: • applications for registration of PDOs, PGIs by producers in third countries • Objections to applications by individuals in third countries can be made directly to the Commission as opposed to via national government channels.

  21. WTO panel ruling on GIs (2004) • upheld integrity of EU’s GI system • questioned the ‘reciprocity and equivalence’ requirement and the registration process for third countries’ applicants • called for implementation by April 3, 2006

  22. Implementation of WTO panel ruling • formal deletion of ‘reciprocity and equivalence’ requirement from regulations • streamlining of registration process for third countries operators, who can now submit applications and objections directly rather than only through their governments • revised regulation entered into force on March 31, 2006

  23. Registration for non-EU countries producers • Group of producers or individuals applies • Application includes specifications, “single document” (intended for publication) and proof of protection in country of origin • Sent to European Commission directly or via national authorities  Third country applications most welcome!

  24. Colombia presented an application for « Cafe de Colombia » • Application received by the Commission on 8.6.2005 • First published in the OJ C 320 of 28.12.2006, p. 17. • Six months opposition period currently running

  25. If the name qualifies for protection: • The Commission publishes (Official Journal of the European Communities) : • Name and address of the applicant, • Name of the product, • Main points of the application • (single document) • The Commission makes public specifications

  26. The single document (1/2) PGI or PDO • 1- Name proposed for registration • 2- Country • 3- Applicant group • Name of Group • Address

  27. The single document (2/2) • 4- Description of the agricultural product or foodstuff • Type of product • Description of the product to which the names applies • Specific rules concerning packaging • Specific rules concerning labelling • 5- Concise definition of the geographic area • 6- Link with the geographical area • Weblink to specifications

  28. Thank you for your attention! Further information at:http://europa.eu.int/qualityfood

More Related