SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Enhancing SuperB Computing: Geant4 Simulation & Detector Optimization

michaeljpeterson avatar
9 diapositives · 148 Views · Jan 07, 2020

Explore Geant4 simulation advancements for SuperB, including electronic response and reconstruction up to particle candidate level. Recent upgrades include geometry improvements and a new Python user interface for easier implementation. Short-term developments focus on interaction region design and maintaining particle genealogy data. Long-term goals involve engaging with detector experts, ensuring consistency between fast and detailed simulation, and addressing personnel matters.

Enhancing SuperB Computing: Geant4 Simulation & Detector Optimization - slide 1
01 / 9Enhancing SuperB Computing: Geant4 Simulation & Detector Optimization
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing SuperB Computing: Geant4 Simulation & Detector Optimization
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Geant4 Simulation Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino SuperB Computing Workshop Frascati, December 17 2008

  2. What we have ? • A detailed Geant4 based simulation • Up to the GHit level (no digitization, no electronic response, no reconstruction) • Geometry description mainly from BaBar • Using GDML • Mainly used for machine background study

  3. What we want • A detailed Geant4 based simulation including the electronic response and a full reconstruction of the digitization up to the particle candidate level • Require a computing model for SuperB • Something we need to think at • A long way to go • Difficult to deliver full set of tools on the TDR timescale

  4. Recent Developments • Geometry Improvements & Bug Fixes • SVT, DCH, EMC End Cap, IFR • See talks in yesterday Detector Full Simulation session • New python based user interface • Simpler than standard G4 macros • Successfully re-implemented Bruno.cc in python • See talk by A. Di Simone

  5. Steps on the TDR time scale • Goal is to deliver tools to support background studies and the detector design and optimization • Complementary role respect to fast simulation • Comes into play when fast simulation is not enough • More flexible geometry description • BaBar geometry is extremely detailed, but very difficult to change • Geometry of sub-detectors reused from BaBar is frozen • Should be easy to implement different options for new sub-detectors • Python interface to generate GDML geometry ? AS an alternative to hand writing of GDML files. • (Simplified) description of electronic response to generate digitization • Different electronic options to be considered • Digitization code from BaBar can only be a reference: need a simpler, more flexible tool. • Are digitization needed for the TDR ?

  6. Short Term Developments • Should be available for the background study for Paris Workshop • New Interaction Region design • Monte Carlo Truth • Store list of particles entering a sub-detector • Store also the genealogy of particles entering a sub-detector • Useful for background studies

  7. On a longer time scale • Interact with detector people • What infos do you need in GHits ? • Do you need digis for TDR • What kind of digis ? • Integration of sub-detectors geometry • Consistency fast-full simulation • Working environment for developers

  8. Consistency between fast and detailed simulation • Need to enforce it • Geometry • A unique geometry description • Derive the simplified fast simulation geometry description from the detailed one • Some ideas around, but need to figure out details • B Field

  9. Personnel issues