1 / 18

The Revision of CDM and CHSW

The Revision of CDM and CHSW. Richard Boland Head of Construction Policy HSE. What I will Cover. Background to industry; Current performance; History and Aims of revision; Main changes; Key Messages; Timetable; Realising the benefits. Background to the Construction Industry .

mickey
Télécharger la présentation

The Revision of CDM and CHSW

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Revision of CDM and CHSW Richard Boland Head of Construction Policy HSE

  2. What I will Cover • Background to industry; • Current performance; • History and Aims of revision; • Main changes; • Key Messages; • Timetable; • Realising the benefits.

  3. Background to the Construction Industry • Output - 8% of UK GDP: 8% working population; • 1.75M site workers and 450k professionals and consultants • 190,000 companies • Over 200+ Stakeholders • No entry threshold/transitory workplaces • £17bn unofficial economy.

  4. Accidents and Ill-Health 2005/06 • Employs 10% of working population, but 28% fatals and 15% major injuries; • 59 fatal accidents to construction workers; • 3677 major injuries to employees; • 7492 over 3 day injuries to employees • 86,000 suffering from work-related ill health. • 3.2 M working days lost per year (injury and illhealth)

  5. Current Industry Performance(Percentage incidence rate changes against targets)

  6. History of the Revision • CDM 1994 came into force on 31 March 1995; • Not widely welcomed at the time; • Slow acceptance, particularly amongst Clients and Designers; • Early concerns about complexity and bureaucracy; • November 2001 revision of CDM ACoP; • March 2005 Consultation; • October 2006 HSC approves package.

  7. What Wasn’t Working? • Mindset of Clients and Designers was slow to change; • Clients had no early access to expert advice; • Competence of organisations and individuals slow to improve; • Communication and co-ordination less than expected; • Effective planning and management less than expected.

  8. What are the aims of the revision? • Simplify the regulations and improve clarity; • Maximise their flexibility; • Focus on planning and management, not ‘The Plan’ and other paperwork; • Strengthen requirements on cooperation and coordination- encourage better integration; • Simplify competence assessment; reduce bureaucracy and raise standards.

  9. What are the main changes? • CHSW and CDM combined; • New trigger for appointments and preparation of the plan; • Clients duty on management arrangements; • A new dutyholder- the coordinator; • Designers to eliminate hazards; reduce risk; • Clarity in relation to competence assessment.

  10. CDM 1994 Enforcing authority; Domestic Client; Demolition; 30 days, 500 person days; 5 or more workers. CDM 2007 Domestic Client; 30 days 500 person days. Trigger for Appointments and Plans

  11. New Duty on Clients • Makes them accountable for the impact they have on H&S standards; • They should make sure things are done, not do them themselves; • Coordinator is their key advisor; • Must provide enough time and resource to allow the project to be delivered safely.

  12. Coordinators • Key Client advisor on competence; provision of information and adequacy of H&S plan; • Coordinate design process and make sure structure is safe to build; safe to use; safe to clean and maintain; safe to demolish; • Should provide the right information to the right people at the right time; • Draw up the health and safety file.

  13. Designers • Must eliminate hazards and reduce risks from the start of the design process; • Designs should be safe to build; safe to use; safe to clean and maintain; safe to demolish; • Should inform others of significant or unusual risks which remain; • Amount of effort put in to risk reduction should be proportionate to the risk.

  14. Competence- three stages • Basic understanding of the risks in construction and how these are controlled; • Sufficient knowledge of the tasks to be undertaken and the risks which the work will entail; • Experience and ability to carry out duties; to recognise your limitations and take action to prevent harm to those carrying out construction work, or those affected by construction work.

  15. Key Messages • Focus will be on effective planning and management of risk; • Paperwork should be risk focussed and project specific; • Provide the right information to the right people at the right time; • All duty holders will need to be competent; • Guidance on competence assessment will be given in the ACoP.

  16. ACOP and Industry Guidance • HSC ‘shortish ACoP which is fit for purpose’; • Supported by Industry produced guidance; • Coordinated through ‘task and finish’ working group of CONIAC.

  17. Timetable • Regulations and ACoP approved by HSC in October 2006; • ACOP published in January 2007; • Regulations laid before Parliament in March 2007; Come into force April 2007; • Timetable is still tight and relies on full engagement and support from industry.

  18. Summary • Evolution, not revolution; • Look for the next Step Change in industry performance; • Focus on effective planning and management through integrated teams; • Actively drive out wasteful bureaucracy; • Real investment in competence and skills of our workforce

More Related