1 / 14

From Quality Assurance to Quality Enhancement The CHE’s Quality Enhancement Project (QEP)

From Quality Assurance to Quality Enhancement The CHE’s Quality Enhancement Project (QEP). Curriculum Officers’ Forum Chris Winberg 5 February 2014. The last round of Quality Audits. The CPUT Audit 2010 Quality assurance philosophy; Measurement of achievements Evidence;

milt
Télécharger la présentation

From Quality Assurance to Quality Enhancement The CHE’s Quality Enhancement Project (QEP)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. From Quality Assurance to Quality EnhancementThe CHE’s Quality Enhancement Project (QEP) Curriculum Officers’ Forum Chris Winberg 5 February 2014

  2. The last round of Quality Audits The CPUT Audit 2010 Quality assurance philosophy; Measurement of achievements Evidence; Followed by institutional quality improvement plans.

  3. Problems with the last round of audits • Based on the UK Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) – without taking into account the SA context; • Inspired by ‘new public management’ processes; • Not developmental or improvement or enhancement-based Showed the ‘cracks’ in the university system… …and some strenghts…. But didn’t have any effect on student success, throughputs, etc…

  4. Inspiration: Vincent Tinto ‘…access without support is not opportunity…’ Strongly underpinned by a ‘social justice’ philosophy…

  5. The new paradigm: quality enhancement The Scottish Quality Enhancement process; • Critical reflection; • Peer review; • Contextual awareness and sensitivity; • On-going, meaningful engagement with teaching and learning

  6. Characterised by: • A longer process (3 -4 years); • Inclusiveness (quality is everyone’s responsibility); • Accessing the student voice; • Theme-based.

  7. Focus areas (or ‘themes’) for Phase 1

  8. What is the role of the curriculum officers?

  9. References Houston, D. & Paewai, S. 2013. Knowledge, power and meanings shaping quality assurance in higher education: a systemic critique. Quality in Higher Education, 19 (3). Newton, J. 2010. A Tale of Two ‘Qualitys’: reflections on the quality revolution in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 16 (1). Sachs, J. & Parsell, M. 2014. Peer review of learning and teaching in higher education. Berlin: Springer. Tinto, V. 1982. Leaving college: rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Tinto, V. 2012. Completing college: rethinking institutional action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

More Related