110 likes | 205 Vues
Explore the complexities of sorting algorithms like Insertion Sort, Merge Sort, and Heap Sort. Discover lower bound definitions and investigate the hypothesis that all sorting algorithms require Ω(nlog(n)) time.
E N D
Analysis of Algorithms I Aaron Bernstein
Sorting Algorithms • Insertion Sort: Θ(n2) • Merge Sort:Θ(nlog(n)) • Heap Sort:Θ(nlog(n)) • We seem to be stuck at Θ(nlog(n)) • Hypothesis: Every sorting algorithm requires Ω(nlog(n)) time.
Lower Bound Definitions • Merge sort: Ω(nlog(n)) on every input • Insertion sort: • 1, 2, 3, 4,…, n-1, n O(n) time • n, n-1, n-2, …, 2, 1 O(n2) time • Hypothesis: For every sorting algorithm A and every integer n, there is some input of length n on which A requires Ω(nlog(n)) time.
Proving Lower Bounds • What if there is some absurd O(n) algorithm? E.g. • Square every third element • For every prime j, A[j] = 2^A[j] • For every j, look up A[j]’th word in the August 2013 New York Times • Etc.
Comparison sorting • Want algorithms that work on any input • e.g. insertion/merge/heap sort • Think about sorting: uses comparisons. • Comparison based sorting algorithm only relies on comparisons + moves • Running time = Ω(# of comparisons)
New Hypothesis Every comparison-based sorting algorithm requires Ω(nlog(n)) comparisons in the worst case.
Required Comparisons • O(nlog(n)) comparisons suffices • merge sort, heap sort • Trivial: need Ω(n/2) comparisons
New Hypothesis Every comparison-based sorting algorithm requires Ω(nlog(n)) comparisons in the worst case. Observation: Tree of height k has at most 2k leaves.
Average Case Analysis • Ω(nlog(n)) comparisons in worst case • Merge sort: always Θ(nlog(n)) • Insertion sort: sometimes Θ(n), sometimes Θ(n2) • Can we get the best of both? Sometimes Θ(nlog(n)), usually O(n)? • NO: need Ω(nlog(n)) comparisons on average among all possible inputs.
Template Slide • Sample Text
Template Slide • Sample Text