1 / 17

State and Regional Migration Patterns

This report presents an in-depth analysis of migration patterns in Michigan as documented by the Census Bureau. It includes data collected from the American Community Survey, revealing significant trends from 2005 to 2009. Michigan experienced a net loss in population due to out-migration, with major sources and destinations identified. The analysis highlights how economic conditions, such as the automobile industry, impacted migration trends over time. Additionally, county-specific population changes are provided, emphasizing the importance of understanding regional dynamics in migration.

minty
Télécharger la présentation

State and Regional Migration Patterns

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. State and Regional Migration Patterns Presented to the R2PC Executive Committee April 12, 2012

  2. Migration Data Based on a Sample • Census Bureau has been collecting data on migratory patterns since 1940 • Migration data released March 28 as part of American Community Survey (ACS) • First release of migration data since 2000 • ACS Data collected on a rolling annual average

  3. Migration Question from ACS • Question from ACS: “Where did this person live 1 year ago. • Respondents provide full address. • Sample gathered over five years.

  4. Michigan Out-Migration vs. In-Migration, 2005-2009 • In-Migration – 128,400 • Out-Migration – 206,600 • Difference – 78,200 net loss

  5. Source of New Michigan Residents by US Region, 2005-2009

  6. Top 10 Sources of In-Migration to Michigan, 2005-2009 • Florida – 13,300 • Ohio – 13,259 • Illinois – 11,150 • California – 7,828 • Indiana – 7,461 • Texas – 6,739 • New York – 4,887 • Wisconsin – 4,864 • North Carolina – 3,700 • Georgia – 3,520

  7. Destination of Departing Michigan Residents by US Region, 2005-2009

  8. Top 10 Destinations of Departing Michiganders, 2005-2009 • Florida – 23,645 • Ohio – 16,213 • Illinois – 13,742 • Texas – 13,144 • Indiana – 12,089 • California – 11,764 • Arizona – 10,826 • North Carolina – 7,829 • Georgia – 7,556 • Tennessee – 6,404

  9. Net In-Migration • Alaska - 805 • Connecticut – 439 • Vermont - 144 • New Hampshire – 9 • Rhode Island - 9

  10. Summary • Michigan has had a net outflow of population since 1998-99 • Still losing population due to negative out-migration, but significant improvement since 2007-2008 • Dependent on economic conditions the automobile industry • Out-migration peaks in mid-1970’s, early 1980’s (worst), and since 2000.

  11. County Population Estimates, 2011 • Estimates released April, 2012 by Census Bureau • Components of population change include: • Natural increase/decrease (births minus deaths) • Net international migration (immigrants, emigrants, military personnel) • Net domestic migration

  12. Components of Hillsdale County Population Change, 2010-2011 • Estimated population, July, 2010 – 46,626 • Natural increase (births minus deaths) – 73 • Net international migration – 27 • Net domestic migration – (208) • ESTIMATED POPULATION, July, 2011 – 46,518

  13. Components of Jackson County Population Change, 2010-2011 • Estimated population, July, 2010 – 160,168 • Natural increase (births minus deaths) – 319 • Net international migration – 72 • Net domestic migration – (815) • ESTIMATED POPULATION, July, 2011 – 159,744

  14. Components of Lenawee County Population Change, 2010-2011 • Estimated population, July, 2010 – 99,762 • Natural increase (births minus deaths) – 116 • Net international migration – 83 • Net domestic migration – (524) • ESTIMATED POPULATION, July, 2011 – 99,437

  15. Components of RegionalPopulation Change, 2010-2011 • Estimated population, July, 2010 – 306,556 • Natural increase (births minus deaths) – 508 • Net international migration – 182 • Net domestic migration – (1,547) • ESTIMATED POPULATION, July, 2011 – 305,669

  16. For further information Timothy Anderson, AICP, Principal Planner (517) 768-6703 tanderso@co.jackson.mi.us Web sites of interest: American Community Survey http://www.census.gov/acs/www/index.html Michigan Census http://www.michigan.gov/cgi/ US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/

More Related