1 / 21

WVU Rocketeers 2012 Conceptual Design Review

WVU Rocketeers 2012 Conceptual Design Review. John Hailer, Ben Province, Justin Yorick Advisors: Dimitris Vassiliadis, Marc Gramlich West Virginia University October 4rd, 2012. CoDR Presentation Contents. Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Overview Theory and Concepts

Télécharger la présentation

WVU Rocketeers 2012 Conceptual Design Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WVU Rocketeers 2012Conceptual Design Review John Hailer, Ben Province, Justin Yorick Advisors: Dimitris Vassiliadis, Marc Gramlich West Virginia University October 4rd, 2012

  2. CoDR Presentation Contents • Section 1: Mission Overview • Mission Overview • Theory and Concepts • Mission Requirements • Concept of Operations • Expected Results • Section 2: Design Overview • Design Overview

  3. CoDR Presentation Contents • Section 3: Management • Team Organization • Schedule • Budget • Mentors (Faculty, industry) • Section 4: Conclusions

  4. Mission Overview • Mission statement: Develop a payload which will measure the following properties of the space environment (up to110 km) during the RockSat C flight. • High-energy particles • Low-energy (plasma) density • Magnetic field • Gravitational field • Flight Dynamics • GHG experiment • Dusty Plasma Experiment • Goal: To measure and analyze data from the flight, and compare the results to known atmospheric models.

  5. Mission Overview: Theory • High energy particles constantly barrage our atmosphere. Measuring the intensity of various species of these particles can reveal much about the source of these emissions, as well as the atmosphere’s composition. • Plasma conditions continuously change in the ionosphere with altitude and time of day. At these given times, the plasma fields resonate at different frequencies. The experiment will compare the instantaneous plasma density and frequency distribution to current atmospheric models. • Earth’s magnetic field decreases as a function of distance from the center of the earth. The magnetic field reflects and traps many charged particles. Measuring field intensity can yield information required to accurately model this phenomena • Comparison between these measurements and current models will show if assumptions made in these models hold up to an extent that they can be accurately used in future atmospheric applications.

  6. Payload Experiments -Brief overview of science goals: 1. Flight Dynamics: identify the dynamics of rocket flight with on-board instrumentation • Acceleration • Rotation • Compare with WFF telemetry 2. Greenhouse Gases: measure concentrations of climate-forcing gasses • Measurement of water vapor, carbon dioxide, and other greenhouse gas concentrations • These measurements necessitate access to an atmospheric port

  7. Payload Experiments (cont.) 3. Cosmic-ray particles: • Identify intensity of cosmic rays during rocket flight • Use an array of Geiger counters 4. Plasma frequencies in radio spectrum: • Rocket apogee of 115-120 km: access to ionospheric E region peak (during daytime) • Experiment measures plasma frequency (~1.3 MHz, simple function of density) and harmonics Atmosphere becomes ionized above 85 km • Rocket Apogee of 115-120 km: ionosphere E region • Also considering adding an experiment to measure the effects of microgravity on a dusty plasma.

  8. Mission Overview: Mission Requirements General: • Apogee: an altitude of ~120 km will allow cosmic-ray and plasma sensors to sample sufficient count levels. • Time: dawn-dusk launch preferable, due to daytime decrease of E-region peak; decrease is greatest in June due to seasonal variation. • Data Acquisition: data intake rates should provide a resolution greater than 80m. • Electronics: payload voltages and currents must meet WFF safety guidelines. • Weight/Mass Distribution: The payload must weigh less than 88N (20lbs), while the COG must lie within 1cm of the central rotation axis.

  9. Mission Overview: Mission Requirements (cont.) Sensor and Payload Specifications: • Flight Dynamics: flight camera requires access to optical port • Radio Plasma Experiment: probe requires access to special port. Scanning range should have a bandwidth of at least 1MHz (1.2-2.2MHz). Swept frequency of 1-6MHz preferred with a resolution of greater than 10kHz • Green House Gases: experiment will require access to dynamic atmospheric port. Sensors for this experiment must be able to detect key GHG’s even in relatively low concentrations (ppm).

  10. Mission Overview: Mission Requirements (cont.) Minimum Success Criteria: • All sensors must activate and provide information at their assigned times. • 45 seconds of low noise acquired data provides atmospheric information over a useable range of altitudes. • Data must be consistent enough to provide insight into accuracy of atmospheric models. Such information will be useful in future applications of aerospace engineering and radio communications by allowing designers to have detailed information about particle conditions in the lower atmosphere. • Successful experiments with GHG detection entail accurate species concentration profiles, which could provide useful information for climate scientist interested in changes in lower atmospheric composition.

  11. RockSat 2011: Concept of Operations h=117 km (T=02:53) Apogee h=75 km (T=01:18) RPE ONDusty Plasma ON h=75 km (T=04:27) RPE OFF Dusty Plasma OFF h=10.5 km (T=05:30) Chute deploys H=.6 km (T=00:3) Entire payload fully activated except for RPE, Dusty Plasma h=0 km (T=00:00) Launch; G-switch activation h=0 km (T=13:00) Splashdown

  12. Payload Design Examples • Sample hardware for various experiments: Note: models cited are representative only. Actual models may comprise several functions on a single component, similar to an inertial sensor.

  13. Mission Overview: Expected Results: Cosmic Rays • Geiger count rates (2010 flight): • In 2012 payload, such profiles will depend on detector resolution and sensitivity. 173 s: Apogee 124 s: Payload separation 369 s: Chutes deploy 910 s: Splashdown 39 s: Orion burnout

  14. Mission Overview: Plasma: Expected Results • Expect at least one or two peaks: • Plasma frequency • Gyrofrequency • Other frequencies possible (upper-hybrid frequency) • Gyrofrequency varies little with altitude, plasma frequency significantly:

  15. Design Overview • For most experiments (flight, Cosmic-ray experiment, Geiger counters, etc) heritage elements from previous WVU Rocksat flights will be integrated into this year’s design. • Structure: Makrolons, brackets, and mounting hardware. • PCBs: main and breakout boards will be revised to accommodate differences in sensor specs. • Circuits and sensors: revised to accommodate updated experiments. • Radio/plasma experiment: significant changes in design planned • Flight Dynamics and camera will likely remain largely unchanged with new redundant fail safe systems built in

  16. FD/RPE Functional Block Power Supply

  17. Design Overview: Payload Layout Flight Dynamics Board RPE Radio Board

  18. Design Overview: RockSat-C 2012 User’s Guide Compliance • Predicted volume: payload expected to fit in requested volume (full canister) • Activation: standard, based on G-switches, and compliant with WFF no-volt regulation. No early activation needed • RBF straps for power system • Shorting wires: patterned after RockSat 2009-2010

  19. Management/ Facilities • Student Design Team: J. Hailer, B. Province, J. Yorick • Advisors: D. Vassiliadis, M.Gramlich • Construction and testing performed at WVU Engineering and Physics departments. • Collaboration with ATK for external payload testing.

  20. Conclusion • The mission of the WVU payload for RockSat C 2012 is to measure several properties of the space environment above 100 km. To facilitate mission development, previous structures and electronics will be modified or redesigned from prior WVU RockSat missions. • At this time, the team is considering adding more experiments to the payload. • At this time, the team resources are being focused on the detailed development of the experiments outlined in this presentation.

  21. Questions?

More Related