1 / 6

ForSpec vs. Accellera Requirements

ForSpec vs. Accellera Requirements. Roy Armoni Intel roy.armoni@intel.com. Status of ForSpec Development. ForSpec 1.0 is the dialect of ForSpec that has been donated to Accellera.

Télécharger la présentation

ForSpec vs. Accellera Requirements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ForSpec vs. Accellera Requirements Roy Armoni Intel roy.armoni@intel.com

  2. Status of ForSpec Development • ForSpec 1.0 is the dialect of ForSpec that has been donated to Accellera. • Collaboration of Intel with Synopsys, Co-Design and Verisity led to ForSpec 2.0 dialect. Main objectives of this design: • Be compatible with Verilog and Superlog to allow natural embedding of ForSpec within Verilog/Superlog files. • Meet the requirements set by Accellera. • Ongoing definition work with Verisity on the incorporation of Forspec 2.0 in temporal-e.

  3. Overall Picture (Summery First) • ForSpec 1.0 meets all Accellera requirements, excluding the following three: • R2a – binding to Verilog Boolean expressions. • R20a – && between regular expressions. • R37a – Abstract clocks – end of sequential event. • ForSpec 2.0 meets ALL Accellera requirements. • Details in the sequel.

  4. R2a – Verilog Syntax • In ForSpec 2.0, the Boolean expression layer has been replaced by Verilog expressions. • On top of them, we added (from ForSpec 1.0): past, future, posedge, negedge, edge, clock, same, mutex, strong_mutex. • future is the new name for the prime operator. • Posedge, negedge and edge correspond to b_rise, b_fall and b_change, respectively. • Also, regular operator’s syntax (of *,?,+,{n},{n,m}) has been changed to *[n..m] to allow embedding within Verilog and Superlog.

  5. R20a – AND between REs • We have added AND to REs. The exact semantics was borrowed from TXP of Synopsys. In terms of regular languages, we defined: L(e1 && e2) = { (w1&&u1 … wm&&um wm+1 … wn) : mn, (w1 … wn)L(e1), (u1 … um)L(e2) }  { (w1&&u1 … wn&&un un+1 … um) : nm, (w1 … wn)L(e1), (u1 … um)L(e2) } • This operator is compatible with Boolean AND: ,i,c,a,r |= e1 && e2 if ,i,c,a,r |= e1 and ,i,c,a,r |= e2. • It is not the same operator as Sugar’s &&. Intel is willing to add an additional operator similar to Sugar’s if required by the committee.

  6. R37a – end of events as clocks • We added the operator ended(e) that takes an extended regular event as parameter and returns a Boolean. Its semantics is: ,j,c,a,r |= ended(e) if there exists ij s.t. ,i,j,c,a,r | e • Any Boolean expression may be used as a clock. • Byproduct: • Latched end-of-event is also defined by the template: matched(e): ended(e)&&CLOCK || ended(ended(e)&&!CLOCK #1 any);

More Related