1 / 26

Vivaldi: A Decentralized Network Coordinate System

Vivaldi: A Decentralized Network Coordinate System. F. Dabak, R. Cox, F. Kaashoek, R. Morris MIT. Outline. Introduction Vivaldi Algorithm Evaluation Coordinate Model Selection Conclusions. Outline. Introduction Vivaldi Algorithm Evaluation Coordinate Model Selection Conclusions.

mireya
Télécharger la présentation

Vivaldi: A Decentralized Network Coordinate System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Vivaldi: A Decentralized Network Coordinate System F. Dabak, R. Cox, F. Kaashoek, R. Morris MIT

  2. Outline • Introduction • Vivaldi Algorithm • Evaluation • Coordinate Model Selection • Conclusions

  3. Outline • Introduction • Vivaldi Algorithm • Evaluation • Coordinate Model Selection • Conclusions

  4. Motivation • Large-scale Internet applications can benefit from an ability to predict round-trip times to other hosts without having to contact them first.

  5. Design Goal • Finding a metric space that embeds the Internet with little error • Scaling to a large number of hosts • Decentralizing the implementation • Minimizing probe traffic • Adapting to changing network conditions

  6. Contribution of the Paper • A decentralized, low overhead, adaptive synthetic coordinate system that computes coordinates which predict Internet latencies with low error • Vivaldi is used by the Chord P2P lookup system • Introduces the notion of a directionless height that improves the prediction accuracy

  7. Outline • Introduction • Vivaldi Algorithm • Evaluation • Coordinate Model Selection • Conclusions

  8. Prediction Error • Let Lijbe the actual RTT between nodes i and j, and xibe the coordinates assigned to node i. • The errors in the coordinates can be characterized using a squared-error function: The goal is to make this error small.

  9. The simple Vivaldi algorithm Called for each new RTT measurement timestep

  10. An Adaptive Timestep • The rate of convergence is governed by the δ timestep • A small δ causes slow convergence • A large δ causes oscillation • Vivaldi varies δ depending on how certain the node is about its coordinates Each node compares each new measured RTT sample with the predicted RTT, and maintains local error

  11. The Vivaldi Algorithm

  12. Outline • Introduction • Vivaldi Algorithm • Evaluation • Coordinate Model Selection • Conclusions

  13. Evaluation Environment • The experiments are conducted using a packet-level network simulator running with RTT data collected from the Internet. • PlanetLab data set: 192 hosts on the PlanetLab network testbed • King data set: 1740 Internet DNS servers

  14. Evaluation: Convergence Slow convergence Oscillates Constant δ Adaptive δ Adaptive δ leads lower error than constant δ

  15. Evaluation: Robustness Using the constant δ, the initial structure of the system has been destroyed, a result of placing to much faith in young high-error nodes. Using the adaptive δ preserves the established order. The evolution of a stable 200-node network after 200 new nodes join.

  16. Evaluation: Communication Patterns When nodes only contact their neighbors, coordinates at the large scale is not accurate.

  17. The effect of long-distance communication Even when only 5 % of the samples involve distant nodes, skewed coordinate placements will be avoided.

  18. Evaluation: Adaptation Converges after 20 sec. Go back to shorter links Increase longer links

  19. Performance Comparison Small network Large network Relative error of Vivaldi is close to that of GNP which requires landmarks.

  20. Outline • Introduction • Vivaldi Algorithm • Evaluation • Coordinate Model Selection • Conclusions

  21. Model Selection • Vivaldi works with any coordinate system that supports the magnitude, addition, and subtraction operations • We consider a few possible coordinate spaces that might better capture the Internet’s underlying structure

  22. Euclidean Spaces Small network Large network Increasing dimension decreases error but increases overhead.

  23. Spherical Coordinates Small network Large network 2D coordinates is better.

  24. Height Vectors • A height vector consists of a Euclidean coordinate augmented with a height • The Euclidean portion models a high-speed Internet core with latencies proportional to geographic distance, while the height models the time it takes packets to travel the access link from the node to the core (e.g. queuing delay).

  25. Height Vector Performance Height vectors perform better than both 2D and 3D Euclidean coordinates.

  26. Conclusions • Proposed a decentralized, low overhead, adaptive synthetic coordinate system that computes coordinates which predict Internet latencies with low error • Introduced the notion of a directionless height that improves the prediction accuracy

More Related