SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Asset Allocation

misha avatar
24 diapositives · 565 Views · Jul 18, 2014

Asset Allocation. Why Dynamic Asset Allocation is winning the race? Arnaud de Servigny. A review of the current Asset Allocation paradigm . Modern Portfolio Theory R.I.P.!.

Asset Allocation - slide 1
01 / 24Asset Allocation
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Asset Allocation
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Asset Allocation WhyDynamicAsset Allocation iswinning the race? Arnaud de Servigny

  2. A review of the currentAsset Allocation paradigm. Modern Portfolio Theory R.I.P.!

  3. On The Efficient Frontier, there is a high degree of certainty and therefore a high degree of concentration!

  4. The efficient frontierusually relies on a limitednumber of support assets

  5. There is verylittleyear on yearstability of the Efficient Frontier

  6. Out-of-sample, the efficient frontierusually drifts to much more modest & sub-optimal performance

  7. Over the past 20 years there has been a trend of growing out-of-sampleunder performance of the MPT

  8. The Market portfolio (CAPM) & the MPT portfolios are equally not doing well

  9. Whydoesn’titwork? There is no variance stability of main asset classes! 1 The critical values for the 90%, 95% and 99% level tests are respectively below 1.22, 1.36 and 1.63, for an rejection (21”0 of no break.

  10. A test to see if we face a fat tail problem or a regime switching problem?

  11. « Through the cycle » correlation and covariance do not exist!

  12. Let us try to look at the world differently!

  13. RegimeSwitchingmodels in a nutshell

  14. Out-of-sample performance of a 3 asset Regime Switching model

  15. An “all weather” mean-variance optimisation fails to capture regime changes and therefore fat tails & the dynamics of fat tails Regime 2 Growth “Through the Cycle “ Average Fat tailed “through the cycle” distribution Regime 1 Recession Time

  16. An Unknown complex multi-regime environment can be approximated by a regularly re-estimated Mean-Variance framework updated with latest information (EWMA estimation) EWMA Estimation of monthly mean / covariance matrix Monthly mean variance process Regime 2 Growth Regime 1 Recession Time Unit of time delta ( t) Unit of time delta ( t) Unit of time delta ( t) Unit of time delta ( t) Unit of time delta ( t) Unit of time delta ( t)

  17. A Case Study • A full out-of-sampleAnalysis • In one case 4 asset classes (CashTB,IG Bond,HY Bond,US Equity ), in the other 9 (CashTB,Gov Bond,IG Bond,HY Bond,DevEquity,EM Equity,Commodities,Real Estate,HedgeFunds) • Thetargetedvolatilitylevel in the portfolio is 8% • 4 methodologies: • Equallyweighted • Mean-Variancereestimatedeveryyearbasedon a 10-year slidingwindow • Mean-Variancereestimatedeveryyearusing a memorydecayestimationmethod (EWMA) • Mean-Variancereestimatedeverymonthusing a memorydecayestimationtechnique (EWMA)

  18. Whobettercopeswith the 8% target vol out-of-sample?

  19. What is the truelevel of asset diversification in eachapproach?

  20. TailRisk

  21. The Return Dynamics

  22. A clearer picture!!!

  23. What is the degree of stability in the portfolios?

  24. Market Prices: Long-term results Data as of 20.06.2012