1 / 29

Supernova Remnants @ HE

Supernova Remnants @ HE. Francesco Giordano University and INFN Bari Gamma 400 Workshop. Outline. Why @ HE (Emission Processes) How Many @ HE (Towards the 1 st Catalog) How Good (Study of systematic errors) Different Families? Conclusions. A “Typical” SNR SED. n H =100cm -3.

misha
Télécharger la présentation

Supernova Remnants @ HE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Supernova Remnants@ HE Francesco Giordano University and INFN Bari Gamma 400 Workshop

  2. Outline Why @ HE (Emission Processes) How Many @ HE (Towards the 1st Catalog) How Good (Study of systematic errors) Different Families? Conclusions F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  3. A “Typical” SNR SED nH=100cm-3 Kep=10-1 Eb=10TeV 1=2 2=4.5 B=100uG Fermi Range Sync 0 Brem IC on CMB nH=1cm-3 Scaling the environment density we pass from a p-p dominated SED to a IC dominated F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  4. Populations F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  5. Synchrotron radiation Zirakashvili and Aharonian (2007) A&A 465 ωc = 1.5 Bp2/(mc)3 F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  6. IC Scattering Stuner et al. (1997) ApJ 490 • U = 0.26 eV/cm3 • T = 2.73 K F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  7. CosmicMicrowave Background Weused the followingexpressionfor the number density of CMB photonas a functionofenergy (blackbodyphotondistribution): • where: • kis the Boltzmannconstant and T = 2.73 K; • The parameterUrepresents the energy density of CMB photons and itisequalto0.26 eV cm-3. Ifwe integrate overallvaluesofenergyweobtain the valueof the number density: F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  8. Bremsstrahlung yield Baring et al. (2000) ApJ 528 Density of environment Bethe-Heitler ultra-relativistic Cross Section F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  9. p-p interactions via 0 decay Parameterization proposed by Kamae et al 2006 F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  10. Cygnus Loop Tycho Fermi-Detected SNRs 13 identified SNRs:-9 interacting - 4 young SNRs CTB37A Vela Jr F. Giordano @ Gamma 400 counts

  11. Detection of the p0-decay bump in SNRs IC 443 and W44 are the two brightest SNRs in the Fermi-LAT range M. Ackermann et al. 2013 • The low energy break is very significant • (~19σ and ~21σ for 60 MeV E  2 GeV); • This gives unambiguous and robust detection of the pion decay bump • and clear proof that these SNRs accelerate protons. F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  12. Fermi-Detected SNRs 13 identified SNRs:-9 interacting - 4 young SNRs + 43 2FGL candidates, excluding spatial associations with PSRs, PWN, AGN F. Giordano @ Gamma 400 counts

  13. SNR Catalog: To better understand SNRs in a statistically significant manner within a MW context we: • characterize the spatial and spectral morphology of all regions containing known SNRs. • examine multi-wavelength (MW) correlation, including spectrum + morphology for radio, X-ray, and TeV and CO, maser, IR, … • determine statistically significant SNR classification(s) and perform spectral modeling F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  14. Characterize GeV Emission:Analysis Procedure • Data Set: • 3 years of P7SOURCE_V6 LAT data • E: 1-100 GeV • Region Of Interest: 10° around each SNR • Overlapping sources? • = None: Add a new extended source • = 1 source (not PSR): Replace w extended source • > 1 source: Replace (non-PSR) source closest to radio centroid w extended source.Delete all other (non-PSR) sources. • Green’s Catalog (2009): • 274+5 SNRs • Localize source, fit extension • Disk extension seed = radio size • Spectral model: power law • Normalization of Galactic diffuse and all sources w/in 5o of candidate are free during minimization procedure. • Starting Model: • 2FGL • Output: • Position, extension, significance • Spectral energy distribution • Region and residual maps • Diagnostics Identifying SNRs via extension: If a SNR’s spatial extension is larger than Fermi’s PSF, we can detect its size, helping to positively identify it. F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  15. SNR Catalog: • Fermi-LAT has the ability to spatially resolve a large number of the 279 known SNRs assuming their GeV and radio sizes are similar. F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  16. SNR Catalog: • Fermi-LAT has the ability to spatially resolve a large number of the 279 known SNRs assuming their GeV and radio sizes are similar. • Spatial extension measured for 15 SNRs, 6 of which are new candidates, permitting clear identification. F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  17. Systematic Error Study To explore systematic uncertainties related to the choice ofthe Interstellar Emission Model (IEM), we localized and fit 8 representative candidate SNRs using alternative IEMs. The eight remnants are a combination of hardand soft and point-like (x) and extended (o) sources and they are located in regions with different intensities of the IEM. F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  18. Alternative IEMs • They are build using GALPROP with input parameters set as: • HI spin temperature =[150K and optically thin], • CR source distribution =[SNR and Lorimer], • Halo height = [4 kpc and 10 kpc], and then fit to the data. • The HI and CO emission split into 4 Galactocentric rings and the inverse Compton emission are fit simultaneously with the source of interest.  Warning: • these 8 models do not span the complete uncertainty of the systematics. • the method for creating this model differs from that used to create the official Fermi-LAT interstellar emission model, so these 8 models do not bracket the official model. F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  19. Systematic Error Study SNR candidates' flux and index averaged over the alternative IEMs' solutions, compared to the standard (STD) model result. Flux: Index: PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY SNRs: Our automated analysis finds a softer index and a much larger flux for SNR347.3-0.5 (RX J1713) than that obtained in a dedicated analysis. [Abdo et al. 2010]Since the best fit radius (0.8o ) is larger than the dedicated analysis’ (0.55o ), the disk encompasses nearby sources that are not in the model. This make it softer than the more accurate analysis. F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  20. End of slide show Radio-GeV Correlation? Radio synchrotron emission indicates the presence of relativistic leptons. LAT-detected SNRs tend to be radio-bright: • Interacting SNRs: general correlation suggests a physical link • Young SNRs show more scatter upper limits (i=2.5, 99%) F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  21. Radio-GeV Index If radio and GeV emission arise from the same particle population(s), under simple assumptions, the GeV and radio indices should be correlated: • Young SNRs: seem consistent • Others, including interacting SNRs: softer than expected • p0decay or e+/-brem. • inverse Compton =2a+1 • Data now challenge model assumptions! • Underlying particle populations may have different indices. • Emitting particle populations may not follow a power law: breaks? • Multiple emission zones? =a+1 F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  22. GeV-TeV Index IC 443 SED Fermi IACT E2dN/dE IC 443 Break region 1 GeV 1 TeV E • Indication of break at TeV energies • Caveat: TeV sources are not uniformly surveyed. F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  23. GeV-TeV Index RX J1713-3946 SED Fermi IACT E2dN/dE Break region RX J1713-3946 1 GeV 1 TeV E • Indication of break at TeV energies • Caveat: TeV sources are not uniformly surveyed. F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  24. Environment? Interacting SNRs tend to be more luminous than young SNRs. • Young SNRs: • Low Lgevolving into low density medium? • Interacting SNRs: • Higher Lgencountering higher densities? F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  25. Or Evolution? Young SNRs tend to be harder than older, interacting SNRs. • Due to • decreasing shock speed allowing greater particle escape? • decreasing maximum acceleration energy as SNRs age? F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  26. May a simple simulation help??? Particle injection =4.5 F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  27. Particle injection =4.5 F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  28. 0->  SEDs Particle injection =4.5  1 F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

  29. Conclusions • Our systematic study has identified a statistically significant population of Galactic SNRs, including: • 6 new extended and >25 pointlike SNR candidates, • evidence for at least 2 SNRs’ classes: young and interacting. • Combining GeV and MW observations suggests that: • some SNRs' emitting particle populations may be linked, • simple model assumptions are no longer sufficient, allowing more complex models to be tested. • Improved observations and modeling will give us greater insight into SNRs, their acceleration mechanisms and their accelerated particles. • Accurately estimating SNRs’ aggregate particle acceleration mechanisms will also allow us to better quantify SNRs’ capability to produce the observed CRs. F. Giordano @ Gamma 400

More Related