1 / 8

Decision Making for UAQM: Theory Vs Practice

Decision Making for UAQM: Theory Vs Practice. Sameer Akbar Senior Environmental Specialist The World Bank Better Air Quality 2006 13-15 December 2006, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Sub-workshop 3: Urban and National UAQM Strategies in Asia. Ideal World: Approach. AQ Monitoring

mistico-harold
Télécharger la présentation

Decision Making for UAQM: Theory Vs Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Decision Making for UAQM: Theory Vs Practice Sameer Akbar Senior Environmental Specialist The World Bank Better Air Quality 2006 13-15 December 2006, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Sub-workshop 3: Urban and National UAQM Strategies in Asia

  2. Ideal World: Approach • AQ Monitoring • Analysis (identify critical pollutant) • Identification of sources (of critical pollutant) • Relative contribution of sources / sectors to emissions and /or ambient levels of critical pollutant • Action planning to decide on interventions to reduce the levels of critical pollutant; involve stakeholders • Economic analysis (cost-effectiveness or cost-benefit) to prioritize actions across sectors • Implementation of the prioritized interventions as part of an integrated AQM approach • Cost of 1-5 : anywhere between US$ 2-5 million!!

  3. IDEALWORLD IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLANNING RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION SOURCE IDENTIFICATION COST ANALYSIS MONITORING TIME

  4. Real World: Constraints • Monitoring: rudimentary • Analysis of data: basic (enough to establish the critical pollutant) • Identification of sources: based on “basic” level of analysis • Relative contribution of sources / sectors: Often guesstimates • Action Planning: opportunistic; limited stakeholder contribution; driven by pressures and political acceptability. • Economic Analysis: minimal • Yet actions are identified and implemented! • Cost-effectiveness and Sustainability are usually questioned.

  5. Real World: Approach • In most developing countries there is nothing like an Ideal World approach to AQM; the approach is usually piecemeal and sector- / source-focused • Action Planning is the focus followed by Implementation • Instead of sound science and economics, the identification of actions / interventions is usually driven by • people (from civil society) • pressures (often through judiciary), and • politics (the will of politicians)

  6. ACTION PLANNING RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION SOURCE IDENTIFICATION ANALYSIS MONITORING REALWORLD IMPLEMENTATION COST TIME

  7. Points for Discussion • Less developed countries (LDCs) do not have the luxury of developing “ideal World” AQM plans. • It is acceptable for AQM plans in LDCs to be opportunistic and possibly sector-focused (rather than integrated). • It is better for LDCs to “learn by doing”, than to delay action for the lack of perfect information. • It is advisable for LDCs to learn from the experience of other countries than spend time and $$$ in developing their own AQM action plans. • LDCs should be assisted with retrofitting “real World” approaches in order to make them effective and sustainable. • LDCs should be assisted with leapfrogging to state-of-the-art interventions for AQM, learning from the experience of developed countries.

  8. Thank You!

More Related