1 / 29

Directional Multiscale Modeling of Images

Directional Multiscale Modeling of Images. Duncan Po and Minh N. Do University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Motivation: Image Modeling. A randomly generated image. A “natural” image. A simple and accurate image model is the key in many image processing applications.

moana
Télécharger la présentation

Directional Multiscale Modeling of Images

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Directional Multiscale Modeling of Images Duncan Po and Minh N. Do University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

  2. Motivation: Image Modeling A randomly generated image A “natural” image A simple and accurate image model is the key in many image processing applications.

  3. Background: Multiscale Modeling • Initially: Wavelet transform as a good decorrelator • Later: Incorporate dependencies across scale and space

  4. New Image Representations • Idea: Efficiently represent smooth contours by directional and elongated basis elements • Idea: Successive refinement for edges in both location and direction

  5. The Contourlet Transform • Contourlet transform (Do and Vetterli, 2002): extension of the wavelet transform using directional filter banks • Properties: sparse representation for smooth contours, efficient FB algorithms, tree data structure, …

  6. The Contourlet Transform Wavelet Contourlet

  7. Our Goals • Study statistics and properties of contourlet coefficients of natural images. - Good understanding of properties would provide key insights in developing contourlet-based applications. • Based on statistics and properties, develop a suitable model. - Key Idea: Model all three fundamental parameters of visual information: scale, space, and direction. • Apply model to applications. - denoising and texture retrieval.

  8. Marginal Distribution (Peppers) Kurtosis = 24.50 >> 3  non-Gaussian!!

  9. Structure of Contourlet Coefficients Each coefficient (X) has: Parent (PX), Neighbors (NX), Cousins (CX) We refer to all of them as Generalized Neighbors

  10. Joint Statistics: Conditional Distributions (Peppers) Parent Neighbor Cousin

  11. Joint Statistics: Conditional Distributions on Far Neighbors (3 Coefficients away) Peppers Goldhill

  12. Joint Statistics: Conditional Distributions (Peppers) P(X| PX = px) Kurtosis = 3.90 P(X| NX = nx) Kurtosis = 2.90 P(X| CX = cx) Kurtosis = 2.99

  13. Joint Statistics: Quantitative • Use mutual information (Liu and Moulin, 2001) • A measure of how much information X conveys about Y • In estimation, quantifies how easy to estimate X given Y. • In compression, if it takes m bits to encode X, then given Y, it takes only m-I(X,Y) bits to encode X.

  14. Joint Statistics: Quantitative • Histogram estimator for mutual information (Moddemeijer, 1989) • Multiple variables: use sufficient statistics (Liu and Moulin, 2001)

  15. Results: I(X;.)

  16. Lena

  17. Average Mutual Information against Individual Generalized Neighbors

  18. Summary • Contourlet coefficients of natural images exhibit the following properties: • non-Gaussian marginally. • dependent on generalized neighborhood. • conditionally Gaussian conditioned on generalized neighborhood. • parents are (often) the most influential. • Next Step: Develop a simple statistical model that takes into account these properties

  19. Hidden Markov Tree (HMT) Model • Developed for wavelets (Crouse et. al., 1998) Transition Matrix A State S Transition Matrix Coefficient u State 1 State 2

  20. Contourlet HMT Model • Each tree has the following parameters • root state probabilities • state transition probability matrix between subband k in scale j and its parent subband in scale j-1 • Gaussian standard deviations of subband q in scale p

  21. Contourlet HMT Model Wavelets Contourlets

  22. Denoising: Bayesian Estimation

  23. Denoising Results: PSNR

  24. Denoising Results: Zelda Noisy, w = 50 PSNR = 14.61 Wiener2, 5X5 PSNR = 25.78 Original Wavelet Thresholding T = 3w , PSNR = 26.05 Wavelet HMT PSNR = 27.63 Contourlet HMT PSNR = 27.07

  25. Denoising Results: Barbara Noisy, w = 51 PSNR = 14.48 Wiener2, 5X5 PSNR = 22.57 Original Wavelet Thresholding T = 3w , PSNR = 21.96 Wavelet HMT PSNR = 23.71 Contourlet HMT PSNR = 23.74

  26. Contourlet Texture Retrieval System

  27. Texture Retrieval: Use Kullback-Liebler Distance

  28. Retrieval Results • Average retrieval rates: • Wavelet HMT: 90.87% Contourlet HMT: 93.29% • Wavelets retrieve better (>5%) • Contourlets retrieve better (>5%)

  29. Conclusions • Contourlets: new true two dimensional transform allows modeling of all three visual parameters: scale, space, and direction • Statistical measurements show: • Strong intra-subband, inter-scale, and inter-orientation dependencies • Conditioned on their neighborhood, coefficients are approximately Gaussian • Contourlet hidden Markov tree model • Promising results in denoising and retrieval

More Related