Exploring Civil Society's Role in Promoting Citizenship for Non-EU Citizens
110 likes | 231 Vues
This study analyzes the role of civil society in fostering citizenship among non-EU citizens across Sweden, Great Britain, the Netherlands, and Italy. Through interviews with 23 NGOs, it highlights key areas such as anti-discrimination and support for refugees and asylum seekers, while examining challenges like financial and organizational resources. Findings emphasize the importance of inter-organizational learning, advocacy, and facilitating citizen participation. The research calls for more inclusive policies and addresses the complexities of NGO engagement with public institutions to enhance democratic participation.
Exploring Civil Society's Role in Promoting Citizenship for Non-EU Citizens
E N D
Presentation Transcript
CIVIC CULTURES AND DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATIONErik AmnåYeS – Youth & SocietyÖrebro University, Swedenerik.amna@oru.se
WORK PACKAGE # 10Civil society’s role in promoting citizenship among non EU-citizensGood practices from Sweden, Great Britain, the Netherlands and Italy
THE STUDY • Inteviews with 23 NGOs • Two policy fields • Anti-discrimination • Refugees and asylum seekers • Different political contexts/welfare regimes • Sweden • Great Britain • The Netherlands • Italy • ”Good practices” – ordinary organisations´ experiences
Delivered societal utilities • Services • Health care, legal aid, information, employment, networks, education, pronounced rights • Watch dog • Advocacy, representing non EU-citizens • Opinion formation • Review and critique, information, unofficial statistics, voice to marginalized groups • Mediation • Individuals – authorities • Between authorities
Preconditions • Financial resources • Personell resources • Organisational resources
Financial resources • Lack of funds – greatest NGO weakness • National and local public funding • Most important NGO income • Promotes cooperation with governments • Legitimizes and de-legitimizes NGOs • EU funding • Genereal weak contacts with EU institutions • Primarily an option for large NGOs
Organisational resources • Inter-organisational learning • Smaller organisations, less attention • Importing strengths from each other • NGO adaptation and flexibility facilitated through network organization • Cooperation with national governments and the EU
Personell resources • Target groups • Receiver of aid – experts and assistants • Volunteers • More directly crucial for smaller NGOs • Members • Ambigious role (due to selection of NGOs?) • Professionals • Important for big as well as small NGOs • External key persons • Politicians, experts
Reflections on NGO policies • Diversity of civil society • Challenges and strengthens European standardization? • Financing • Ear-marked funding may jeopardize NGOs’ internal work and priorities • EU funding perceived as complicated • European funding favours strong NGOs • NGO as policy initiator & implementator • Uncritical self-understanding in GB & NL • Doubtful attitude in SE
Policy implications • Create more participatory opportunities! • Be aware of diversity among NGOs – and across political contexts! • How can locked relationships where states and NGOs get stuck on each other be changed and altered? • Is the ’Active Citizen’ Policy of EU and its member states trustworthy as long as they hand over the realisation of basic citizen rights to NGO´s of various capacities? • Public institutions influence NGOs and civic culture – not only the other way around!