1 / 22

High-Voltage High Slew-Rate MOSFET Op-Amp Design

High-Voltage High Slew-Rate MOSFET Op-Amp Design. 2005 Engineering Design Expo University of Idaho Erik J. Mentze Jennifer E. Phillips April 29, 2005. Project Sponsor: Apex Microtechnology. Advisors: Dave Cox, Herbert Hess. Overview. Project Description Design Methodology

moeshe
Télécharger la présentation

High-Voltage High Slew-Rate MOSFET Op-Amp Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. High-Voltage High Slew-Rate MOSFET Op-Amp Design 2005 Engineering Design Expo University of Idaho Erik J. Mentze Jennifer E. Phillips April 29, 2005 Project Sponsor: Apex Microtechnology Advisors: Dave Cox, Herbert Hess

  2. Overview • Project Description • Design Methodology • Theory of Operation • Implementation and Results • Conclusions and Future Work

  3. Project Description Develop a high-voltage (+/- 200 V) high slew-rate (1000 V/us) MOSFET op-amp.

  4. Project Description Apex currently offers op-amps that operate at 400 volt differentials with slew-rates of 1000 V/μs. These products are open-frame type designs, utilizing discrete surface-mount components. Our goal is to develop an amplifier design that matches these performance specifications, while being well suited to IC implementation.

  5. Design Methodology Power Limitation (P=IV) High-Voltage High Slew-Rate

  6. General Amplifier Topologies • Find topology candidates • Throw out those that are obviously deficient • Analytically compare the “finalists” to make the best choice Hardware Implementation • Find components that meet our design requirements • Adapt chosen topology to meet physical requirements • Simulate Implementation • Attempt to Implement Design

  7. Theoretical Considerations Two Techniques to Improve Slew-Rate: 1. Reduce Capacitances 2. Increase Current Modern Amplifier Research Focus: Reducing Size of Frequency Compensation Capacitor(s) Significant Increase in Circuit Complexity!

  8. Three-Stage Dual-Path Amplifier • reduce capacitance • - increase current drive Active Frequency Compensation

  9. Theory of Operation The active nature of the feedback allows us to model the frequency and phase response of the amplifier as an Active RC Filter and fit it to response function we choose.

  10. A good choice for maximum bandwidth and good phase margin is a third-order Butterworth response:

  11. Implementation

  12. Devices Found TO92 Package: Zetex ZVN0545A Zetex ZVP0545A Surface Mount: Zetex ZVP0545G Zetex ZVP0545G

  13. TO92 Specifications

  14. Implementation

  15. Uncompensated Operational Results DC Gain: 110dB Unity Gain Freq: 100MHz

  16. Compensated Operational Results DC Gain: 110dB Unity Gain Freq: 10MHz Phase Margin: 35o

  17. Slew-Rate Results Rail-to-Rail Operation Slew-Rate: 2000 V/us!

  18. Implementation

  19. Test Setup

  20. Conclusions We have shown that active feedback techniques can be successfully implemented as a means of achieving extremely high-slew rate op-amp designs. DC Gain: 110dB Unity Gain Freq: 10MHz Slew-Rate: 2000 V/us Future Work Further testing of the prototype will be conducted by Apex in Tucson, Arizona Implementation in an integrated circuit form.

  21. ?

  22. Literature Research [1] H. Lee, et al., “A Dual-Path Bandwidth Extension Amplifier Topology With Dual-Loop Parallel Compensation,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 38, no. 10, Oct. 2003. [2] H.T. Ng, et al., “A Multistage Amplifier Technique with Embedded Frequency Compensation,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 34, no 3, March 1999. [3] H. Lee, et al., “Active-Feedback Frequency-Compensation Technique for Low-Power Multistage Amplifiers,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 38, no 3, March 2003. [4] K. Leung, et al., “Three-Stage Large Capacitive Load Amplifier with Damping-Factor-Control Frequency Compensation,” IEEE Transactions on Solid-State Circuits, vol. 35, no 2, February 2000. [5] H. Lee, et al., “Advances in Active-Feedback Frequency Compensation with Power Optimization and Transient Improvement,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 51, no 9, September 2004. [6] B. Lee, et al., “A High Slew-Rate CMOS Amplifier for Analog Signal Processing,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 25, no. 3, June 1990. [7] E. Seevinck, et al., “A Versatile CMOS Linear Transconductor/Square-Law Function Circuit,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-22, no. 3, June 1987. [8] J. Baker, et al., CMOS: Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998. [9] B. Razavi, Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill, 2001. [10] Sedra, Smith, Microelectronic Circuits, 5th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2004. [11] Schaumann, Van Valkenburg, Design of Analog Filters. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2001. [12] V. Kosmala, Real Analysis: Single and Multivariable. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2004.

More Related