1 / 37

Inclusive Placement Opportunities for Preschoolers: A Systems Approach to Preschool Inclusive Practices

Inclusive Placement Opportunities for Preschoolers: A Systems Approach to Preschool Inclusive Practices. A project of the Virginia Department of Education and the Training and Technical Assistance Centers of Virginia. Inclusion.

montgomery
Télécharger la présentation

Inclusive Placement Opportunities for Preschoolers: A Systems Approach to Preschool Inclusive Practices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Inclusive Placement Opportunities for Preschoolers: A Systems Approach to Preschool Inclusive Practices

  2. A project of the Virginia Department of Education and the Training and Technical Assistance Centers of Virginia

  3. Inclusion • Means coordinated efforts between general and special educators to meet all or some of the student’s individualized educational program (IEP) in the general education classroom with same-aged peers • Refers to the process of placing children with disabilities in the same classes or programs as their typically developing peers and providing them with the necessary services and supports (Winter, 1999)

  4. What does inclusion really mean? • A value to support all • Children who have disabilities attending preschools with “typically developing peers” • Collaboration • Supporting teachers • Policies in place • Sharing responsibility for all • Facilitating friendships • Teaching within the routine • Natural proportions

  5. What inclusion is NOT • Dumping students with disabilities • Grouping by ability level • Cutting back on special education services • Expecting ECE staff to teach without support • Identifying children by their disabilities • Isolating children with disabilities

  6. Rationale for inclusion • Legal • Philosophical • Moral, ethical and social • Educational

  7. Separateness in education can … • Generate a feeling of inferiority as to (children’s) status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone. This sense of inferiority affects the motivation of a child to learn … (and) has tendency to retard … educational and mental development. Chief Justice Earl Warren, Brown vs. Board of Education

  8. Sec. 612 State Eligibility. `(5) Least restrictive environment.-- `(A) In general.-- To the maximum extent appropriate, children with disabilities, including children in public or private institutions or other care facilities, are educated with children who are not disabled, and special classes, separate schooling, or other removal of children with disabilities from the regular educational environment occurs only when the nature or severity of the disability of a child is such that education in regular classes with the use of supplementary aids and services cannot be achieved satisfactorily.

  9. Continuum of alternative placements: Sec. 300.130 Least restrictive environment. (a) General. The State must have on file with the Secretary procedures that ensure that the requirements of Secs. 300.550-300.556 are met, including the provision in Sec. 300.551 requiring a continuum of alternative placements to meet the unique needs of each child with a disability.

  10. Note related to LRE for preschoolers • The requirements … apply to all preschool children with disabilities who are entitled to receive FAPE. Public agencies that provide preschool programs for preschoolers without disabilities must ensure that requirements are met.

  11. Note related (cont’d.) • Public agencies that do not operate programs for preschoolers without disabilities are not required to initiate such programs solely for LRE but alternative methods are required such as (age-appropriate settings): • Part-time integration (Head Start, VPI, kindergarten) • Placement in private school/preschool • Locating classes at elementary schools • Providing services at location child presently enrolled

  12. Moral, ethical and social rationale • The right thing to do • Acceptance of others

  13. Educational rationale • Opportunities for play and social interaction • Role models • Higher expectations • Developmental gains

  14. Educational rationale • Students with disabilities make equal or greater gains in all areas of development (Wolery, 1995) • Students with disabilities in inclusive programs show improvement in cognitive, communication, social and emotional areas (Power-deFur, Bricker, & Orelove, 1997) • Quality of work from students without disabilities unaffected; may improve slightly over time in inclusive classrooms (Salisbury, Brookfield, & Odom: DEC presentation, 2004)

  15. Positions of national organizations • Council for Exceptional Children’s Division for Early Childhood (DEC) • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)

  16. How will inclusion benefit: • Teachers • Children with disabilities • Children without disabilities • Families of children with disabilities • Families of children without disabilities • Administrators

  17. Indicator 8.1.1 of 3: SERVICE SETTING: The percentage of children receiving special education and related services in settings with typically developing peers USDOE Performance and AccountabilityFY 2005 Program Performance PlanIDEA: Special Education Preschool Grants 2005 Program Goal: To help preschool children with disabilities enter school ready to succeed by assisting states in providing special education and related services. Objective 8.1 of 1: Preschool children with disabilities will receivespecial education and related services that result in increased skills that enable them to succeed in school.

  18. USDOE FY 2005 Program Performance Plan, Goal 2, IDEA, Special Education Preschool Grant www.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/2005plan/edlite-idea-preschool.html

  19. Inclusion options • Full inclusion • Part-time inclusion • Reverse inclusion

  20. Full inclusion • Enrolling natural proportions (10-12%) of children with disabilities full time with same-age peers without disabilities in neighborhood settings

  21. Neighborhood settings • Head Start • Even Start • Title 1 • LEA-sponsored 4-year-old programs (VPI) • High school vocational child care • Community-based preschools/child care

  22. Full inclusion can be supported by: • Collaborative model • Consultative model

  23. Collaborative model • Preschoolers with disabilities are enrolled full time in regular ECE programs • 8 students with disabilities are enrolled in Head Start, VPI or child care • ECSE teacher and paraprofessional co-teach with ECE teacher

  24. Collaborative model 8 ECSE students 2 teachers and 2 paraprofessionals VPI Head Start 16-20 students

  25. Collaborative model • 8-10 students with disabilities enrolled between 2 ECE classes • ECSE and paraprofessional are in classes full time and co-teach with ECE teacher

  26. Collaborative model 8 ECSE students 4 ECSE students 1 ECE class 4 ECSE students 1 ECE class

  27. Essentials of a collaborative model • ECSE and ECE teacher meet weekly to plan together • Related services providers meet with direct service personnel monthly • Collaborative agreements exist between programs • Administrative support is provided

  28. Consultative model • ECSE students are included in ECE classes • ECSE and paraprofessional support students based on IEP needs

  29. Consultative model 8 ECSE students 3 ECSE students Community child care 3 ECSE students VPI class 2 ECSE students Head Start class

  30. Essentials of a consultative model • ECSE and ECE teachers meet weekly to plan/discuss students • Related service providers meet with direct service personnel monthly

  31. Part-time inclusion • ECSE student splits time between ECE classroom and special education settings • ECSE student is enrolled in self-contained classes but joins ECE classes for resources

  32. Essentials of part-time inclusion • ECSE and ECE staff meet on a regular basis • Children with disabilities should be included with children of the same age • Related service providers meet with direct service personnel monthly • Administrative support is provided • Developmentally appropriate practices are used

  33. Reverse inclusion • Equal or greater numbers of children without disabilities attending ECSE classes full time • Educational programming that combines the use of effective practices in ECSE and ECE (e.g., schedule, routine-based assessment and instruction, integrated therapy)

  34. Essentials of reverse inclusion • ECSE teacher consults on a regular basis with ECE teachers • Monthly planning meetings are held with related service personnel • Students without disabilities are enrolled within the class • Developmentally appropriate practices related to curriculum and instruction are used

  35. Challenges • Administrative • Curriculum/teaching • Philosophical/attitudes • Families • Staff concerns: teachers, paraprofessionals, related service providers • Logistical

  36. Successful inclusion takes: • Changes to: • Staff roles • Family-school collaboration • Program policies • Ways children’s social relationships evolve • Classroom environment • Discipline practices • Instructional practices

  37. References and resources • Wolery and Odom: “An Administrator’s Guide to Preschool Inclusion” • DEC-recommended practices • Cavallaro and Haney: “Preschool Inclusion” • Circle of Inclusion Web site (http://circleofinclusion.org)

More Related