1 / 12

The Effect of Shape and Color on Recall

The Effect of Shape and Color on Recall . Kristen Brookes, Meredith Elliott, & Sarah Pasquale. Past Research . Familiarity with a road sign leads to faster reaction times Processing the meaning of the signs is an automatic response which leads to an automatic behavior Road Block Paradigm

morag
Télécharger la présentation

The Effect of Shape and Color on Recall

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Effect of Shape and Color on Recall Kristen Brookes, Meredith Elliott, & Sarah Pasquale

  2. Past Research • Familiarity with a road sign leads to faster reaction times • Processing the meaning of the signs is an automatic response which leads to an automatic behavior • Road Block Paradigm • Drivers at road blocks not being able to recall there was a sign but performed the action the sign recommended (sharp left turn) • (Crundall & Underwood, 2001)

  3. Past Research • For each shape we develop a template -priori (Hatzidimos, 2004)

  4. Research Question • Does practice and familiarity have an effect on shape and color recognition? • Example: Road Signs

  5. Hypothesis • It is hypothesized that participants will have a faster reaction time to shapes and colors that are more prominent in everyday life

  6. Method • Participants • 9 • 5 females • 4 males • No known color deficiencies in participants • Undergraduate students at small liberal arts college • Equipment • Gateway Computer • Shape Response Experiment created in JAVA (Krantz, 2008)

  7. Method • Stimulus • Series of shapes • Octagon, Circle, Rectangle, Triangle Down, and Triangle Right • Red, Green, Yellow, and White • Duration of Stimuli: 100ms • Procedure • 125 trials • Responded using mouse

  8. Results • Repeated Measures ANOVA • Reaction Times, Percentage shape and color were chosen 1st, and each color • Differences in means of reaction times to color was not significant F(3)=.141, (p=.934) and reaction times to shape was not significant F(4)=1.353, (p=.272) • Difference in means of percentage shape was chosen first was significant F(4)=4.019, (p=.009) • Difference in means of percentage color was chosen first was not significant F(3)=.857, (p=.477) • There was no interaction

  9. Results

  10. Discussion • There should be no difference in color due to conditions in external environment • Indication of faulty signs if color results significant • We cannot rely on color for sign recognition because the color can vary substantially: • Fading • Weather conditions • Time of day • Shadowing (Hatzidimos, 2004) • Shape remains constant making them more reliable • Insignificant differences in shape and color reveal that we respond equally fast to all signs possibly due to practice effects

  11. Conclusion • Cross – cultural effects • Using other shapes and color • Standard for comparison – indication of practice effects • Words inside shapes • Automaticity • Recognition without processing

  12. Questions?

More Related