1 / 41

Still Handling the Paper Load : Alternatives to ‘Batch Processing’ for English Teachers

Still Handling the Paper Load : Alternatives to ‘Batch Processing’ for English Teachers. Hopkins, 1912:.

morse
Télécharger la présentation

Still Handling the Paper Load : Alternatives to ‘Batch Processing’ for English Teachers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Still Handling the Paper Load:Alternatives to ‘Batch Processing’ for English Teachers

  2. Hopkins, 1912: • When we decided that “pupils should learn to write by writing, English composition, previously known as rhetoric, became ostensibly a laboratory subject, but without any material addition to the personnel of its teaching force; there was merely a gratuitous increase in the labor of teachers who were already doing full duty.”

  3. “Can Good Composition Teaching Be Done Under the Present Conditions?”

  4. Yes, if we try to limit the time spent in marathon grading sessions • No, if we continue to treat time responding to student essays as a “side job” or “homework”

  5. Hopkins, 1912: “Every year teachers resign, break down, perhaps become permanently invalided, having sacrificed ambition, health, and in not a few instances even life, in the struggle to do all the work expected of them.”

  6. Using Class Time for Response • Newkirk: “Read the Papers in Class” (1979) • Treat writing classes as writing laboratories • D’Agostino: “Conference Class Sessions” (2005) • “Response is instruction.” • “Response time is instructional time.”

  7. SideshadowingTeacher Response Nancy Welch (1998)

  8. The Process: • Read through the first paragraph, considering the following questions, and write back to yourself in the margins of your paper:   • What questions or hesitations did you have as you wrote? • What were you thinking or feeling as you wrote? • Where did you leave out ideas or information?  Why did you leave them out? • What lines or phrases don't seem relevant?  Why? Questions from the PowerPoint Presentation: "Sideshadowing: Engaging the Student Through the Sideshadowing Response to Writing" by Jill Moyer Sunday, Waynesburg University. ftp://classes.waynesburg.edu

  9. Students also Write an “End Comment”: • After you have written back to yourself in the margins of each paragraph, read over all you have written. • What does this new material tell you about your writing? • How can you revise taking this the marginal text into consideration?

  10. While teacher comments “foreshadow” what a text should or mustbecome… • Student comments “sideshadow” what a text could or mightbecome.

  11. Welch uses Bakhtin to theorize sideshadowing as a “centrifugal, diversifying force.” • It makes the student and teacher focus on the “here and now” of the text rather than what the teacher wants it to be in the future.

  12. Sideshadowing Alters Our Time Use: • Sideshadowing takes some class time to introduce as a concept and about one class meeting per paper for students to complete the process. • But it takes less time for the teacher to make his or her way into a text and discover what the student wants to address. • The “work of locating the draft within a field of possibilities is no longer up to [the teacher] alone.”

  13. Works Cited • D’Agostino, Karen N. “Conference Class Sessions: Reducing Paper Load While Supporting Student Revision through Effective In-Class Response.” More Ways to Handle the Paper Load, on Paper and Online. Urbana: NCTE, 2005). • Newkirk, Tom. “Read the Papers in Class.” How to Handle the Paper Load. Urbana: NCTE, 1979. • Welch, Nancy. “Sideshadowing Teacher Response.” College English. 60.4 (1998). 374-95.

  14. Cold Conferences Positioning Writers at the Center of Response and Revision Steve Smith

  15. Assumptions • The writing and all writing decisions belong to the student. • Teacher is a reader, as well as a writing resource and mentor, not an editor. • The student leads the conference. • Cold conferences can provide more access to the student’s writing process and mental text.

  16. Practices • Student delivers document with marginal comments and questions inserted. • Questions are open-ended to encourage discussion instead of easy answers and “fixes.” • Teacher quickly reads revised draft, after peer review, for first time – cold -- during conference. • Student leads discussion of paper, using inserted comments if necessary.

  17. Process (cont.) • Teacher listens and addresses student’s ideas and concerns. • Student and teacher discuss the paper. • Student takes notes. • Student writes a revision plan and emails it with conference notes to the teacher within 48 hours. • Student revises writing.

  18. Benefits • More student and teacher one to one interaction. • Teacher is able to work with the writer, not just the writing. • Encourages student ownership of writing and self-identification as a writer. • Supports teacher reflective practice. • Helps to manage paper load.

  19. Using Screen Capture Software for Video Comments Barrie Olson

  20. What are video comments? http://screencast.com/t/vikvOzsnVM

  21. Why I Like Video Comments • Starts the conversation • Makes you focus on the bigger picture • It limits how much you can comment on • Shows your students that you’ve really read their work • Allows you to do more with less • Makes you as a reader seem more human

  22. How does it work? • I use Jing though there are many other free options available. • Once downloaded, you click “capture” and it will record your screen as you talk • Limited to five minutes • Once saved, it is stored on your Screencast account and students can access it via a link.

  23. Related Resources • Anson, C. (1997). In our own voices: Using recorded commentary to respond to writing. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 69, 105-113. • Anson, C. (2003). Responding to and assessing student writing: The uses and limits of technology. In B. Huot & P. Takayoshi (Eds.), Teaching writing with computers: An Introduction (234-246). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.. • Sommers, N. (2006). Across the Drafts. College Composition and Communication, 58(2), 248-257. • Sommers, N. (2012). Beyond the red ink. New York: Bedford/St. Martins.

  24. Using Rubrics to Help Handle the Paper Load Hollye Wright

  25. Assessment: Formative and Summative • Formative assessment is given throughout the learning process to measure how well students are learning the material. These assessments can take many forms but in all cases they provide feedback to the instructor on what students are learning and where knowledge gaps exists. These assessments also provide information for the students and allows them to see where they need to focus their attention in order to meet course goals and outcomes. Formative assessments are low stakes and allow additional learning to occur before the final graded assessments are administered.

  26. Assessment: Formative and Summative • Summative assessment is given at the conclusion of a unit of study to measure how well students mastered the learning outcomes. These assessments are high-stakes and end with an evaluation or grade.

  27. Holistic Rubric • A broad, overall, general assessment of the entirety of the process • Groups performance dimensions so that student performance is assessed as a whole across multiple dimensions Taken from: Cathy L. Bays, PhD, RN "Strategies For Using Rubrics As A Form of Assessment”

  28. Holistic Rubric Informal Class Work

  29. Analytic Rubric • Provides specific information abut student performance on multiple dimensions so that their performance may be assessed on those dimensions across the scales • Allows for separate scale assessment of student performance on each dimension Taken from: Cathy L. Bays, PhD, RN "Strategies For Using Rubrics As A Form of Assessment”

  30. Evaluation ArgumentDr. Wolfe Writer:

  31. Tips for Using Rubrics Effectively • Limit your comments to areas addressed on the rubric • Comment on two or three areas and mark a score on other areas • Write only on the rubric • Evaluate the rubric after grading and note changes that you want to make in the future

  32. Sources • http://www.csub.edu/TLC/options/resources/handouts/Rubric_Packet_Jan06.pdf • http://rubistar.4teachers.org/ • Angelo, Thomas A, and K P. Cross. Classroom Assessment techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993. Print

  33. Responding to Student Writing: Joys and Concerns Shannon Howard

  34. According to Nancy Sommers, This Method Isn’t Helpful for Them or You.

  35. Consider Focusing on Three Major Joys and Concerns Per Student Essay. • Place no marks on the student’s actual essay. Instead, write suggestions on an attached page/checklist/rubric (handwritten or word processed). • List 3 “joys” or positive characteristics. List 3 “concerns” or areas for improvement. • Keep suggestions clear, concise, but enthusiastic. • Discuss revision expectations with the class.

  36. Joys and Concerns are Used to Start Dialogue, Not Just to Identify Strengths and Weaknesses. Joys: 1. I had NO idea that you could use ____ to do that! Can you tell me how you learned about this? 2. The part where you write ____ is the most memorable for me. What made you think of it? Concerns: 1.Wait, didn’t you say that ___ never happens? Why do you talk about it on p2? 2. Your point about ____ never comes up after the first page. Am I missing something?

  37. This Method Asks Students to See Writing as Conversation. • These joys and concerns can become the basis for conferences (see Dethier). • They reflect your experience as a reader as well as your role as a teacher. • They keep you focused on “big picture” ideas rather than just occupied with correcting errors.

  38. Works Consulted Dethier, Brock. The Composition Instructor’s Survival Guide. NH: Boynton/Cook, 1999. Sommers, Nancy. “Responding to Student Writing.” CCC. 33. 2 (1982): 148-56. Welch, Nancy. “Sideshadowing Teacher Response.” College English. 60. 4 (1998): 374-95.

More Related