1 / 33

Dragline in operation along FL 62 nr Ft Green Springs

Design of Water Quality Monitoring. Dragline in operation along FL 62 nr Ft Green Springs. How do you find trends in water quality, without historic data?. Assessment of Effects of Differing Watershed Land Uses on Water Quality based on Comparisons of Six Stream/River Systems:

mort
Télécharger la présentation

Dragline in operation along FL 62 nr Ft Green Springs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Design of Water Quality Monitoring Dragline in operation along FL 62 nr Ft Green Springs

  2. How do you find trends in water quality, without historic data?

  3. Assessment of Effects of Differing Watershed Land Uses on Water Quality based on Comparisons of Six Stream/River Systems: • St. Mary’s River- Control • Myakka River-Large Agricultural Impact • Horse Creek – Limited Impacts of Agriculture & Mining • Payne Creek- Large Phosphate Mining Impact • Peace River at Arcadia- Combined Agricultural & Mining Impacts • S. Prong Alafia River- 60-70% Mined Basin

  4. St Mary’s River- control No Trends in Water Quality over Time

  5. Myakka River- Agricultural Pollution: Increasing sp. cond. & [K]

  6. Specific Conductance- Myakka River

  7. Potassium- Myakka River

  8. 95th 75th 50th 25th 5th

  9. Six Site Comparison of Mean Data for Seven Water Quality Parameters- Mined Watersheds Elevated in: • 1. Specific Conductance 6. [F] • 2. [Na] 7. [TP] • 3. [Ca] • 4. [Mg] • 5. [SO4]

  10. Specific Conductance

  11. Sodium

  12. Calcium

  13. Magnesium

  14. Sulfate

  15. Fluoride

  16. Total Phosphorus

  17. Will such changes in water quality affect the fauna?

  18. Bishop Harbor Algal Bloom in Response to Piney Pt. Effluent

  19. Effluent Treatment & Discharge

  20. Water Quality in Reclaimed Wetland Streams • Hall’s Branch • Jamerson Jr. • Lizard Branch • Dogleg • Pickle • Tadpole

  21. The Normal Progression by Levels of Approximation in Field Toxicity Testing: • TIER 1- Is there toxicity by standard lab. bioassays? • TIER 2- Is there toxicity for native species in situ? Are species “missing” that should be present? • TIER 3- What is the toxicity due to? • TIER 4- What is the source of the toxin(s)?

  22. Chronic Toxicity in Reclaimed Wetlands (Charlotte Cty. Data: 10/25/03; 3/2/04) Crustacean FETAX Site pH Sp. Cond. Repr. Malfor. Growth Jam. 6.9 106,148 + + Lizard 7.6 290,296 + + Pickle 6.8 395,486 + + Halls 6.8 340,483 + Dog 7.5 309,328 + Tadpole 7.2 220,403 +

  23. WATER CHEMISTRY OF RECLAIMED STREAMS USED FOR BIOASSAYS BY CHARLOTTE COUNTY, Oct. 2003; March 2004 Parameter Dog Hall’s Jamerson Lizard Pickle Tadpol e pH 7.8 6.7 6.5 8.1 6.7 6.9 7.1 6.9 7.1 7.1 6.9 7.5 Sp Cond, uS/cm 328 483 148 290 486 403 309 340 106 296 395 220 Oxygen, mg/l 6.8 1.5 7.0 12.6 0.8 2.8 8.6 2.1 8.0 7.1 1.2 2.1 Iron, ug/l 325 117,000 583 547 4230 11,300 212 4025 195 352 786 1100 Manganese,ug/l 41 1880 136 71 127 166 22 392 21 30 72 20 Aluminum, ug/l 160 226 391 445 107 669 132 35 101 45 <5 95

  24. Acute (A) and Chronic (C) Toxicity in Horse Creek Tributaries (IMC- Marinco data;1/21/04) Site pH Sp. Cond. Ceriodaph. Shiner Fathead 8W 4.4 74 A,C A C 1W 5.1 122 C C 2E 5.6 88 C C 6W 5.9 97 C C Piez. 7.8 266

  25. HCSP Needs Changes • Water quality - re-set trigger levels; add sampling sites above and below points of discharge and increase number of samples • Bio-monitoring - use full 3 tier system of bioassays on field observations, lab tests and in-situ enclosures

  26. HCSP Needs Changes • The Bottom Line - Design rigorous plan for bio-monitoring prior to agreement - Convene outside panel free from conflicts of interest to design plan and oversee implementation

  27. A Physical Analogy for the Cumulative Adverse Ecological Impacts of Mining

More Related