1 / 8

Age discrimination in the courts: recent and forthcoming case law

Age discrimination in the courts: recent and forthcoming case law. Presentation by Michael Rubenstein Publisher, Equal Opportunities Review Editor, Industrial Relations Law Repo rts. Age limits for recruitment or retention (1 ).

moses
Télécharger la présentation

Age discrimination in the courts: recent and forthcoming case law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Age discrimination in the courts: recent and forthcoming case law Presentation by Michael Rubenstein Publisher, Equal Opportunities Review Editor, Industrial Relations Law Reports

  2. Age limits for recruitment or retention (1) - Radio 1 example: must “change to connect with a new generation” (see EOR 192, Strictly young) - Is trying to convey a youthful image justifiable? - To what extent does replacing older workers with younger involve ageist stereotyping?

  3. Age limits for recruitment or retention (2) - Petersen (C-341/08): maximum age limit of 68 to practice as dentist in Germany AG Opinion: justifiable to provide opportunities for new generation – ie job blocking - Seldon v Clarkson Wright & Jakes (CA judgment awaited): partner in law firm retired at 65. EAT accepted need to create promotion prospects was justification.

  4. Age limits for recruitment or retention (3) • Wolf v Stadt Frankfurt (C-229/08): upper age of 30 for recruitment as firefighter AG Opinion: justified because firefighters will only work until 45/50 - Contrast Baker v NATS: ET holds age limit of 36 for recruitment as air traffic controller unlawfully discriminatory

  5. Redundancy arrangements (1) - MacCulloch v ICI: contractual scheme with bands that were more age discriminatory than statutory scheme had to be justified - Loxley v BAE: exclusion of workers entitled to occupational pension from contractual redundancy scheme had to be justified

  6. Redundancy arrangements (2) • Andersen: Is exclusion from redundancy payment of those in receipt of early retirement pension contrary to the Directive? • London Borough of Tower Hamlets v Wooster: EAT upholds finding that council made 49-year old employee redundant because it wanted to avoid early retirement costs at age 50.

  7. Default retirement age: Age UK case • Administrative Court holds introducing DRA did not contravene Framework Directive • Met legitimate policy aim of “maintaining confidence in the labour market” • Expresses view that age 65 is no longer justified • Only realistic alternatives for HMG from 2011 are to raise DRA to 68 or 70, or scrap it altogether

  8. Contact details Michael@Rubensteinpublishing.com

More Related