1 / 18

Research of TCP Vegas Congestion Control Algorithm over GEO Satellite Networks

Research of TCP Vegas Congestion Control Algorithm over GEO Satellite Networks. 學生：林泰邑 指導老師：林仁勇老師 日期： 2007.03.14. Author && Source. Author ： Microwave, Antenna, Propagation and EMC Technologies for Wireless Communications, 2005. Source:

munin
Télécharger la présentation

Research of TCP Vegas Congestion Control Algorithm over GEO Satellite Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Research of TCP Vegas Congestion Control Algorithm over GEO Satellite Networks 學生：林泰邑 指導老師：林仁勇老師 日期：2007.03.14

  2. Author && Source • Author： Microwave, Antenna, Propagation and EMC Technologies for Wireless Communications, 2005. • Source: Gong Changqing,Zhao ZhigangWang GuangxingSchool of information Science & Engineer, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China

  3. Outline • Introduction • Introduction of Vegas algorithms and variation of Vegas • Vegas3 Algorithm presented in this paper • Network environments and simulation results. • Conclusions

  4. Introduction • The satellite networks have bigger round trip time and higher bit error ratio . • The round trip time of GEO networks is about 520 millisecond. where l is the packet length B is the transmission rate • When packet size is 1MBytes, Bandwidth is 1mbps ,the slow start duration of GEO is about 3.91secs

  5. Introduction • The bit error ratio is generally in 10-6 or 10-7. • TCP was initially developed for wire-line with low BER, such that the majority of segment losses are due to network congestion. • The sender reduces its transmission rate even when segments are lost because of bit errors.

  6. Introduction of Vegas • Depending on the δ, difference of “expected sending rate (expected throughput)” to “actual sending rate (actual throughput)”, Vegas algorithm can estimate the available network bandwidth. • cwnd：Size of congestion window • BaseRTT：Minimum of all measured round trip time • ActualSend：Number of actual sending packet • RTT：Actual measured round trip time

  7. if δ<α if δ>β if α≦δ ≦β Vegas • The cwnd is changed according to the following equation • Slow Start：cwnd is doubled for every two RTT. • If congestion • Three duplicated ACK： cwnd= ½ cwnd • Timeout：cwnd=1 • Congestion Avoidance：

  8. Vegas-A • Vegas algorithm can predict the usage condition of network bandwidth, but the values of α and β are fixed（usually α=1，β=3）, the effect of congestion control is limited. • Vegas-A algorithm is presented for the improvement of Vegas , where ‘A’ stands for adaptive, it makes α and β value adjust automatically. • The improvement of the algorithm is mainly displayed in congestion avoidance period.

  9. If δ < α { If α > 1 and Th(t) > Th(t-rtt) { ++cwnd; } Else if α >1 and Th(t) ≦ Th(t-rtt) { --cwnd; --α; --β; } Else if α==1 ++cwnd; } if β≧δ≧α{ if Th(t) > Th(t-rtt) { ++cwnd; ++α; ++β; } Else if Th(t) ≦ Th(t-rtt) { α, β, cwnd not change } Vegas-A • If δ > β { If α > 1 {--α;--β;} --cwnd; } Else { not change α、β and cwnd } • Th(t) :the actual sending rate at time t • Th(t-rtt) :actual throughput rate measured one RTT before t.

  10. Vegas1 • The improvement idea of Vegas1 algorithm comes from Vegas-A algorithm; but the adjustment strategy of the congestion window is different from Vegas-A algorithm. • The improved goal is to make the algorithm more balanced and steadier, make the algorithm more adaptive.

  11. Vegas1 • The improvement measure is preventing the increase of congestion window from so rashly. During the course of congestion avoidance, change all operation of “cwnd=cwnd + 1 “in Vegas-A algorithm into “cwnd=cwnd+(1 / cwnd)”. In order to improve performance further, the measure is not to lower the window too carelessly, whenever need, only reduce the window by 1 /cwnd.

  12. Vegas3 • The improvement idea of Vegas3 algorithm comes from Vegas algorithm and Vegas-A algorithm; Vegas3 is the harmonization of two algorithms. • When δ < α ,the cwnd will be increased; if it can‘t be increased, it will be kept unchanged. • When δ > β , the cwnd will be decreased or kept unchanged. • When α ≦ δ≦ βthe cwnd will be kept constant or increased.

  13. Vegas-A: if α ≦ δ ≦ β { if Th(t) > Th(t-rtt) { ++cwnd; ++α;++β; } if Th(t) ≦ Th(t-rtt) { cwnd = cwnd; } Vegas-3: if α ≦ δ ≦ β { if Th(t) > Th(t-rtt) { ++cwnd; ++α;++β; } if Th(t) ≦ Th(t-rtt) { cwnd = cwnd; } Vegas-A Algorothm V.S. Vegas-3 Algorothm

  14. Vegas-A: If δ < α { If α > 1 and Th(t) > Th(t-rtt){ ++cwnd; } Else if α >1 and Th(t) ≦ Th(t-rtt) { --cwnd; --α; --β; } Else if α==1 ++cwnd; } Vegas-A Algorothm V.S. Vegas-3 Algorothm • Vegas-3: If δ < α { If α > 1 and Th(t) > Th(t-rtt){ ++cwnd;++α;++β; } Else if α >1 and Th(t) ≦ Th(t-rtt) { cwnd=cwnd; } Else if α==1 ++cwnd; }

  15. Vegas-A: If δ > β { If α > 1 { --α; --β; } --cwnd; } Vegas-A Algorothm V.S. Vegas-3 Algorothm • Vegas-3: If δ > β { If Th(t) ≦ Th(t-rtt){ --cwnd; if cwnd < 2 { cwnd=2;} If α > 1 { --α;--β;} } If Th(t) > Th(t-rtt){ cwnd=cwnd; }

  16. Network Environments GEO Satellite GSL Up Link:2mbps Down Link:2mbps GSL Up Link:2mbps Down Link:2mbps Ground Station Ground Station

  17. Network Environments && Simulation Result Simulation Result

  18. Conclusion • During congestion avoidance phase, the Vegas3 divides network conditions into more state, that can actual communication conditions of the satellite networks. • The values of α and β adjustment strategy can adapt actual variety of network.

More Related