1 / 7

Mixing Methods in the Discipline of Politics by Renske Doorenspleet

Mixing Methods in the Discipline of Politics by Renske Doorenspleet. (A) Quantitative and Qualitative Methods. Qualitative methods : Words Small-N Cases central Points of view of participants Researcher close Theory development Process Unstructured Contextual understanding

mura
Télécharger la présentation

Mixing Methods in the Discipline of Politics by Renske Doorenspleet

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mixing Methodsin the Discipline of Politicsby Renske Doorenspleet

  2. (A) Quantitative and Qualitative Methods Qualitative methods: • Words • Small-N • Cases central • Points of view of participants • Researcher close • Theory development • Process • Unstructured • Contextual understanding • Rich, deep data • Micro Quantitative methods: • Numbers • Large-N • Variables central • Point of view of researcher • Researcher distant • Theory testing • Static • Structured • Generalization • Hard, reliable data • Macro see also Bryman(2004: pp.286-288)

  3. (B) Mixing Methods: Lieberman’s framework • How would you investigate the same questions by using mixed methods? • Tarrow (1995): triangulation: use of qualitative and quantitative methods to answer one and the same research question • But how? Read: Lieberman, E.S. (2005). ‘Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research’ in American Political Science Review, vol.99, no. 13, pp. 435-452

  4. (B) Mixing Methods: Lieberman’s framework • Explanation framework Two crucial steps: • large-N quantitative analyses (LNA) • small-N qualitative analyses (SNA) • model testing • model building

  5. (B) Mixing Methods: Lieberman’s framework • Some examples of studies using framework • Relationship economic development and democracy • Relationship civic culture and welfare • Relationship international trade and human rights

  6. (C) Mixing Methods: Strengths and Weaknesses • Strengths: combination of best of both worlds • Better concepts and measurements; caused by more internal validity (SNA) and more external validity (LNA) • Better case selection; clear guidelines and criteria for case selection in SNA • Better contribution to theory development

  7. (C) Mixing Methods: Strengths and Weaknesses • Weaknesses 1. Not always better concepts and measurements 2. SNA is nested within LNA, so in the end LNA determines research agenda 3. Incompatibility thesis

More Related