1 / 20

Protein folding mediated by solvation: Water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural

Protein folding mediated by solvation: Water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural collapse. Margaret S. Cheung, Angel E. Garcı´a, and Jose´ N. Onuchic. Department of Physics, University of California at San Diego Received 11/26/2001. Max Shokhirev

nadalia
Télécharger la présentation

Protein folding mediated by solvation: Water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Protein folding mediated by solvation: Waterexpulsion and formation of the hydrophobiccore occur after the structural collapse Margaret S. Cheung, Angel E. Garcı´a, and Jose´ N. Onuchic Department of Physics, University of California at San Diego Received 11/26/2001 Max Shokhirev BIOC585 December 2007

  2. Energy Landscape/Funnel Theory • Levinthal paradox1: • Statistically, it would take 1030 seconds for proteins to sample all possible 3D conformations in a random manner. • In reality the number of allowed conformations is considerably smaller since folding follows the path of least energetic frustration. http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/images/wetsurf.gif 1) C. Levinthal, J. Chem. Phys. 65, 44 (1968)

  3. Energy Landscape/Funnel Theory • Traditionally we can apply this model to protein folding if the energy funnel for the protein is relatively smooth. • Fast folding • Simple folding mechanism • Independent folders

  4. A concern… • What about solvent effects? • Solvent effects are incorporated implicitly in previous energetically unrestricted models • This means that (de)solvation effects of the hydrophobic core are not taken into consideration in the potentials.

  5. Protein (De)solvation • Hilson et al. showed that forcing water into the hydrophobic core of ß-protein leads to increased folding times1,2. • Hummer et al. calculated the effect of solvation on free-energy of simple alkane molecules, and that the PMF between two methane-like particles exhibits two minima3: • Van der Waals distance between the particles • Solvent separated minimum distance 1) Hillson, N., Onuchic, J. N. & Garcı´a, A. E. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 14848–14853. 2) Garcı´a, A. E., Hillson, N. & Onuchic, J. N. (2000) Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 138, 282–291. 3) Hummer, G., Garde, S., Garcı´a, A. E., Paulaitis, M. E. & Pratt, L. R. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 1552–1555.

  6. Can we incorporate desolvation?

  7. A Minimalist Model for Water-Mediated Interaction Pseudo Contact Native Contacts No Contact

  8. A Minimalist Model for Water-Mediated Interaction • Gō-like potential was used • only attractive interactions are assigned to the native contacts (bond, angle, dihedral, LJ, electrostatic, and etc.) • repulsive interactions are assigned to the nonnative contacts (desolvation potential) • Two possible contacts for non-local interactions

  9. Multicanonical Sampling • Adding non-native interaction perturbs the energy funnel. • No longer energetically unfrustrated since desolvation barrier is relatively high. • Cononical sampling rarely samples energies high enough to cross local energy barriers since energy comes from normal distribution. • Instead use a uniform energy distribution function that allows for frequent high energies, and then simply “fix” the data at the end (Multicanonical).

  10. Q and “pseudo” Q • Q • Folding parameter used to quantify native contacts (How close are we to the “native” form?) • Pseudo Q • Folding parameter used to quantify solvation contacts (What is the degree of solvation?) • Normalized

  11. Applying the model to the SH3 family of proteins http://www.answers.com/topic/1shg-sh3-domain-png

  12. Free Energy vs Q and pseudo Q High Free Energy Low Free Energy Figure 2B

  13. Figure B,E High Free Energy Low Free Energy Red = native Blue = Water contact

  14. Figure 2B-E

  15. Two step folding process… • First step involves a structural collapse toward a nearly native ensemble (τ1). • Mediated by the expulsion of 23 water molecules from the diverging turn and distal loop.

  16. Two step folding process… • Second step involves water expulsion from the hydrophobic core (τ2). • Mediated by the cooperative expulsion of 17 water molecules

  17. Figure 2C Cooperative Water Expulsion from Hydrophobic Core

  18. Specific Heat Comparison

  19. Conclusions… • Folding process of SH3 protein has two steps • structure-search collapse to a nearly-native ensemble • Corresponds well to experimental data1,2 • Insights into general folding mechanism • “desolvation” step • This can be achieved using a minimalist model • Gō-like model with a“desolvation” feature in the tertiary contacts pair potential • multicanonical sampling required. 1) Zhang, O. & Forman-Kay, J. D. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 3959–3970. 2) Mok, Y.-K., Kay, C. M., Kay, L. E. & Forman-Kay, J. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 289, 619–638.

  20. Thank you… “Protein folding mediated by solvation: water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural collapse.” Cheung MS, García AE, Onuchic JN. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(2):685-90.

More Related