1 / 19

Standards Development

Standards Development. MARC Conference June 21, 2006 Tim Gallagher President, ReliabilityFirst Corporation. In The Beginning. There were 3 Regions (MAIN, ECAR, MAAC) There were 3 sets of rules & guides There were 3 cultures NOW We work together to put Reliability First.

nadine-pena
Télécharger la présentation

Standards Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Standards Development MARC Conference June 21, 2006 Tim Gallagher President, ReliabilityFirst Corporation

  2. In The Beginning • There were 3 Regions (MAIN, ECAR, MAAC) • There were 3 sets of rules & guides • There were 3 cultures NOW We work together to put ReliabilityFirst

  3. Governance • Organization designed with energy legislation in mind • Supports strong, centralized, top-down ERO • Hybrid Board with balanced sector representation • Organization open to all who benefit from bulk electric system • All meetings public

  4. Hybrid Board • Sector representatives elected by sector • Composition • 3 Independent Directors • 3 Transmission Company Directors (one from RTOs) • 2 Supplier Directors • 3 LSE Directors (Small, Medium, Large) • 3 At large Directors

  5. Standards • Inclusive, fair, balanced process • Mirrors the current NERC process but is streamlined somewhat • Using the process to combine three legacy sets of regional standards into one • Definite need for regional standards • Must examine and combine three sets of legacy standards into one • GOAL: CONSISTENCY AND UNIFORMITY

  6. Need for Day One Operation • Teams began work months before 1/1/06 • 6 ReliabilityFirst standards approved 12/12/05 • Follow NERC format for reliability standard • Used volunteer drafting teams from 4 Regions • Comments by open process • Expedited timeline • Approved by ReliabilityFirst Board of Directors

  7. Need for Day One Operation • Standard Development Process Manual approved 12/12/05 (Based on NERC Standards Process Manual) • Updated 1/19/06 to revise RFC committee references (already dog-eared after 3 months) • Process already used to complete approval of Resource Planning Reserve RequirementsStandard • Established & set 5 SDTs in action • Processing 3 more SARs • Used for Interpretation

  8. How Are RFC & NERC Similar • Start process with a SAR • Use RFC Standards Committee & Standards Process Manager (comparable to NERC SAC) • Select drafting teams - self nominations (encourage other Regions participation) • Public posting for comments & consensus • Post responses • Ballot by RFC membership • Submit to RFC Board

  9. How Do RFC & NERC Differ • Need specific support statement by RFC Reliability and Interim Compliance Committee • Possible revision – Committees’ comments submitted along with others during public posting – similar to NERC • Membership ballot • One vote per “regular RFC Member” – not weighted • Negative vote with comment does not cause 2nd ballot • Advisory vote for RFC Board approval

  10. How Do RFC & NERC Differ • If 2/3 affirmative membership votes, RFC Board will: • Approve Standard action (as opposed to adopt) • Remand to Standards Committee with comments and instructions, or • Disapprove proposed Standard action without recourse.

  11. How Do RFC & NERC Differ • If less than 2/3 membership vote, Standards Committee will: • Recommend termination of all work, inform Board • Revisethe SAR, remand to SDT for further development • DirectSDT reconsider/modify certain aspects & post for 2nd membership vote

  12. How Do RFC & NERC Differ • If less than 2/3 affirmative vote on 2nd ballot, Standards Committee will: • Forward to Board with recommendation • Board will then: • Approve with or without modifications • Remand to Standards Committee with instructions • Disapprove without recourse

  13. What About Interpretations? • Any Standard, regardless of effort put in, may not be perfectly clear • Directly & materially effected person may request interpretation • Drafting team assembled (Makeup based on subject area and expertise) • Interpretation to Reliability & Compliance Committees for review • Forward to Board for concurrence

  14. Other Items Related to Process • Continually collect Process Manual improvements based on high level of activity • Joint drafting team participation with other Regions, specifically MRO • RFC Standards staff active with NERC Standards process for input/feedback • Keep all RFC members informed on NERC Standards issues, key RFC Standards due dates (balloting, commenting, etc.) • RFC compliance staff on every drafting team

  15. What Do We See In Near Term • Based on current SARs, expect 7 SDTs working by 3rd quarter 2006 • Cross referencing (currently underway) of 3 “legacy” documents with current NERC standards and NERC “fill-in the blanks” effort will definitely create need for more drafting teams (prioritization clearly needed) • Based on lessons learned, expect more detailed Process Manual approved mid year 2006

  16. Approved Standards • Resource Adequacy • Automatic Reserve Sharing • Emergency Operations • Regional Transmission Loading Relief • System Restoration • Operating Reserves

  17. Standards Under Development • Fill in the blank standards • 23 Standards that require regions to_____ • CBM • Operating Reserves • UFLS • Sub-regional adequacy • Blackstart capability plans • Generator testing • Disturbance monitoring • Special protection systems

  18. Want to Learn More? • Subscribe to our newsletter • We can add you to our Standards distribution list • General Seminar • July 28 – Columbus, Ohio www.rfirst.org 330-456-2488

More Related