450 likes | 1.1k Vues
. Learning style: an individual's preferred way of gathering, interpreting, organizing, and thinking about information.Davis, B.G., 1993, Tools for Teaching. Comparing Two Learning Style Models. Information processing modelConcrete Experience (feeling)Reflective Observation (watching)Abstr
E N D
1. MBTI and Learning Style Valerie N. Williams
Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs, College of Medicine
Director, OUHSC Faculty Leadership Program
2. Learning style:
an individuals preferred way of gathering, interpreting, organizing, and thinking about information.
Davis, B.G., 1993, Tools for Teaching
3. Comparing Two Learning Style Models Information processing model
Concrete Experience (feeling)
Reflective Observation (watching)
Abstract Conceptualization (thinking)
Active Experimentation (doing)
Kolb,D. 1984 Personality
model
Four dichotomous preferences
Extravert Introvert
INtuitive Sensing
Thinking Feeling
Judging Perceiving
16-Types
4. Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences Katherine- Mother; Isabel- DaughterKatherine- Mother; Isabel- Daughter
5. MBTI Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Theory: Carl Jungs Psychological Type; normal personality differences (1923 Jungs book Psychological Types translated to English)
Developers: Katherine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs-Meyers (1923-41 begin study of Jungs work and people behavior)
Application: Identify natural preferences
Best use: understand self potential strengths/blind spots; appreciate differences, unique contributions offered by self/others
Worst use: pigeon hole self or others Katherine- Mother; Isabel- Daughter
Developers: Katherine Cook Briggs (1875-1968) and Isabel Briggs-Meyers (1897-1980)
Theory: Carl Jungs (1875-1961) Psychological Type;Katherine- Mother; Isabel- Daughter
Developers: Katherine Cook Briggs (1875-1968) and Isabel Briggs-Meyers (1897-1980)
Theory: Carl Jungs (1875-1961) Psychological Type;
6. Mental Processing Perceiving
Information intake Judging
Information organization; drawing conclusions Katherine- Mother; Isabel- DaughterKatherine- Mother; Isabel- Daughter
7. Attending to the World We use the 4 essential mental processes daily though an internal or external focus on the world.
External focus on people, things, experience and external events is Extraversion
Internal focus on inner processes, thoughts and reflections is Introversion
8. Four preferences Extraverting or Introverting are the ways we get our energy
Sensing or INtuiting describes how we prefer to gather information Thinking or Feeling are how we organize information and make judgments about that information
Judging or Perceiving are about our lifestyle and how we prefer to organize and relate to the world around us
9. Considered together Our mental processing preferences and attending to the world preferences include sixteen variations based on four dichotomies (E or I; S or N; T or F; J or P)
These variations are
the 16 MBTI Types
10. Sixteen Variations
11. MBTI Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Strength of preference is indicated by a score on the MBTI instrument. Picture it this way for Extraversion and Introversion: Katherine- Mother; Isabel- DaughterKatherine- Mother; Isabel- Daughter
12. Extravert-Introvert
13. Learning Implications?
14. Learning ImplicationsExamples
15. Sensing-Intuition
16. Learning Implications?
17. Thinking-Feeling
18. Learning Implications?
19. Judging-Perceiving
20. Learning Implications?
21. Fast Tracking for Learning Enhancement Using Four Preference Themes Called Function Pairs
Faculty can use Jungs perceiving (sensing and intuition) and judging (thinking & feeling) functions as focus for core learning style.
Upside reduces variations from 16 to four. More manageable for planning teaching approach and monitoring learning engagement.
Downside ignores energy source. May be important as resource for active learning.
22. Preference Theme ST Function
23. Preference Theme SF Function
24. Preference Theme NF Function
25. Preference Theme NT Function
26. Summary & Questions
27. References & Resources Briggs-Myers, I. Introduction to Type, 5th Edition. Palo Alto: CA: Consulting Psychologists Press: 1993.
Davis, BG. Tools for Teaching, p. 185, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 1993.
Jung, C.G., (1971). Psychological Types. A Revision by RFC Hull of the Translation by HG Baynes. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
Kolb, DA. Experiential Learning: Experiences as a Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
Provost, J.A., and Anchors, S. (Eds.) (1987) Applications of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in Higher Education Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.
Svinivki, MD, and Dixon, NM. Kolb Model Modified for Classroom Activities. College Teaching, 1987, 35(4), 141-146.
Briggs Myers, I., McCaulley, M.H., Quenk, N.L., Hammer, A.L. MBTI Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Third Edition (Form M). Palo Alto CA: CAPT