1 / 10

Community Cohesion or Social Engineering?

Community Cohesion or Social Engineering?. Andy Steele Salford Housing & Urban Studies Unit University of Salford. 25 th March 2010. Outline. Background to the Community Induction Programme (CIP) CIP in action – Rochdale & Oldham Project evaluation approach Emerging issues

nam
Télécharger la présentation

Community Cohesion or Social Engineering?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Community Cohesion or Social Engineering? Andy Steele Salford Housing & Urban Studies Unit University of Salford 25th March 2010

  2. Outline • Background to the Community Induction Programme (CIP) • CIP in action – Rochdale & Oldham • Project evaluation approach • Emerging issues • Best practice – what works & why? • CIP or social engineering?

  3. Background to CIP • Response to housing pressure in traditional BME areas: • High level of overcrowding & property disrepair • Long waiting lists for traditional areas • Low priority among BME community for non-traditional areas • Previous ‘poor experience of BME households moving to non-traditional areas

  4. CIP in Rochdale - overview • Bellshill Estate • Adjacent to traditional BME area • Low demand & relatively high void rate • Allocation to several void properties to be let at the same time • Targeted BME households on HWL from traditional areas • Provision of support to assist ‘move’ and settlement on estate

  5. CIP in Rochdale - Support • Tailored rather than generic approach: • Support included: • Personal interviews with potential movers • Accompanies viewings of property • Practical assistance to move home • Provision of key staff contact details • Provision of information about community facilities/services • Regular ‘progress’ checks • 45 households supported by Summer 2009 (predominantly Asian)

  6. CIP in Oldham • Developed from Rochdale initiative • Boroughwide initiative • Linked to tackling hate crime/racial harassment • Support package: • Accompanied viewings • Security surveys of properties • On-going support for initial 8 weeks then ad hoc • Regular advice surgeries • Out of hours support service for victims of racial harassment • Ad hoc contact via FCHO staff 142 families ‘supported’ by 2004/5

  7. Evaluation Approach • Focus on Bellshill (Rochdale) & Chadderton (Oldham) • 3 phases: • Familiarisation with scheme documentation • Interviews with scheme staff • Interviews with residents: • ‘Supported’ households • Long-standing residents of study areas • ‘Supported’ households who had moved-on

  8. Emerging issues • Responding to BME housing needs • Initial experience of movers • Longer-term impact of CIP & transformation of non-traditional areas • Contribution to community cohesion • Successful?

  9. Best practice • Issues for consideration: • Strategic management vs ‘laissez faire’ • Single vs multiple BME communities • Choice of area – size & geography • Individual household vs ‘collective’ move • Preparing the ‘host’ community • Responding to hate crime & racial harassment • Flexible support package • Development of community-based activities • CIP & different tenures

  10. CIP or Social Engineering? CIP raises a number of fundamental questions? • How different is CIP to ‘red lining’ among Birmingham estate agents in 1980s? • Is social engineering part of the professional role of housing officers? • Does social engineering contradict CBL? • Does the end justify the means: • increase BME housing options • contribution to community integration? • Who takes responsibility if it fails? • Whose definition of a ‘mixed’ community?

More Related