1 / 12

Reversing Viewpoints

Reversing Viewpoints. Videotape and the Attribution Process: Reversing Actors’ and Observers’ Points of View Katie Harnish. Outline. Background Methods Results Discussion Questions Reference. Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE).

nam
Télécharger la présentation

Reversing Viewpoints

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reversing Viewpoints Videotape and the Attribution Process: Reversing Actors’ and Observers’ Points of View Katie Harnish

  2. Outline • Background • Methods • Results • Discussion • Questions • Reference

  3. Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE) • “The tendency to assume other people’s actions are caused by their personal, individual qualities rather than external, situational forces” (Ross, 1977).

  4. Background • Individuals (Actors) seem to articulate potential causes and reasoning behind their own behavior through increased emphasis on external cues (Situational Factors). • Outsiders (Observers) often consider more internal cues dispositional factors versus situational when explaining others’ behavior.

  5. Contributing Factors • Differences in actors’ and observers’ points of view: • Availability of information about external surroundings, behavior, and contexts • Processing of information

  6. Purpose of Study • Can actor’s and observers’ points of view be reversed through changing visual orientation?

  7. Methods • Overview of Experimental Procedure: • Interpersonal Conversations-”Getting Acquainted” • Videotape Replays • Actor-Same Orientation • Observer-Same Orientation • Actor-New Orientation • Observer-New Orientation • Control Group (No videotape replay) • Post Questionnaire

  8. Methods cont’d. • 120 Participants-30 groups of 4 people • Measures: Personality Characteristics Situational Characteristics

  9. Results • Visual orientation is key when actors and/or observers are interpreting behaviors. • No significant differences between perceived level of behavior and differences in attributions (situational, dispositional) • Significant differences in the correlation between role (actor/observer) and videotape orientation.

  10. Results cont’d. • Actors attributed relatively more to situational causes than did observers (control and same orientation group) • Actors attributed relatively more to dispositional than observers (new orientation group). • For the questionnaire: dominance was difficult to assess for subjects (observers, self)

  11. Discussion Question • What are some possible implications from the results of this study?

  12. Reference • Storms, M. D. (1973). Videotape and the Attribution process: Reversing actors' and Observers' points of view.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 165-175. 

More Related