Download
1 / 6
60 likes | 187 Vues
The World Economic Forum highlights the need for enhanced meta-analysis and systematic reviews in e-health impact studies. Key recommendations include developing shared policy briefs, addressing biases, and creating incentives for negative studies to be reported. There is a call for agreed methods and inclusion criteria, along with the registration and certification of e-health services. To improve study quality, stakeholders should collaborate globally, establish a repository of studies, and implement a code of practice for evaluations. These efforts will drive global e-health uptake and improve public trust in digital health interventions.
E N D
Metrics Future Directions
The time is ripe for meta-analysis of systematic reviews/ impact studies • Develop shared policy briefs based on the meta-analysis • Understand study biases and barriers to study • Methods/inclusion criteria need to be agreed • Not enough of a forum for negative studies
Create incentives for impact studies • The proposal x registration and certification of E-health services will be an incentive for impact studies • Share opinions on methods and metrics btw EU-US • Evaluate code of practice • Reporting Systems on adverse ICT events • Impacts of contextual and cultural differences
Policy actions to encourage impact studies and global eH uptake Register studies & results 112 (cf. 111) reimbursement Register, certify & label eH services with risks & benefits Work with OECD, WHO, WEF, EU, ONC, HTAi, AMIA… More interest in study results Funding More capacity to do studies Education Global network of eH innovation centres More high quality impact studies Shared US / EU definitions & metrics Register evaluators, competing interests Improve study quality Evaluation code of practice
Next Steps • Meaningful Use • Repository of Studies • Shared Metrics and Methods • Code of Practice for Evaluation Studies (resources to support evaluators) • ICT adverse event reporting system
