1 / 12

The “Scientific Method”

The “Scientific Method”. Malcolm Crowe 15 March 2004. Why?. MSc should “demonstrate sustained rational argument” “Scientific method” is a frequently cited model for rational argument Really a style of discourse Famous and still controversial This lecture will give some history

naomi-olson
Télécharger la présentation

The “Scientific Method”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The “Scientific Method” Malcolm Crowe 15 March 2004

  2. Why? • MSc should “demonstrate sustained rational argument” • “Scientific method” is a frequently cited model for rational argument • Really a style of discourse • Famous and still controversial • This lecture will give some history • And present conventions 2000+

  3. References • Gjertsen, D: Science and Philosophy (Penguin 1989) • Whewell, W (1840): Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences (Thoemmes 1999) • Feyerabend, P (1975): Against method (Verso 1988)

  4. Scientific Method Birth to Death • The likely story (Plato, 360BC) • Hypothesis (Bacon 1620, Descartes 1644) • Reid (1785) Explanation not enough • Hypothetico-deductive (Whewell 1840) • Modernism (Popper 1934) • Failure of modernism: • Scientific diversity (marine biology, strings) • Mathematics collapses (Russell 1902) • The Bohr-Einstein debate (1948) • Postmodernism (Rorty 1981)

  5. Induction and Deduction • Aristotle (330 BC) dialectics .. induction and deduction • deduction from premises to results • induction to find premises (but how?) • Great scientific disasters: Lavoisier (1789), Kelvin • eliminative induction (Bacon 1605) • resolution and composition (Mill 1843) • complex methods did not help much • blind application of induction fails

  6. Hypothetico-Deductive Method • Plato (Timaeus) look for a likely story • with observed state a natural outcome • F Bacon (1620) scientific approach • “places all wits .. nearly on a level” • though techniques may require mastery • science advances by rational argument • Descartes (1644) hypothesis: • story that explains many observations • Whewell (1840) requires prediction • and some luck: results must be new • Einstein (1915) Theory of Relativity

  7. Scientific Theories • are systems of hypotheses • satisfying set of causal explanations • need revision if predictions fail • Popper (1934) “falsification” • incorrect appeal to mathematical logic • theories are not disproved • but qualified by more successful ones • sometimes facts are discarded too

  8. Postmodernism • Postmodernism suspicious of • grand narratives, universal methods • absolute realities or objective truths • So just present your ideas rationally • obey normal conventions of subject • don’t fudge the data too much • don’t block the line of inquiry • Importance of academic community • What community are you writing for? • Rorty (1991) solidarity

  9. Practice today • Convincing investigation • Hypotheses from anywhere • similarity to previous successful ones • should account for existing data • Should make usable predictions • look for better hypotheses if not • At least write it up this way round • even if you got the data first • critics say that cheating is necessary

  10. Objectivity • Rorty (1980) merely a compliment • no method of absolute truth • Try to avoid personal opinion • offer a road anyone can follow • experiments in principle repeatable • arguments acceptable in community • Kierkegaard (1840) Focus on results • subjective writing focuses on process

  11. Project Guidelines • Use hypothetico-deductive method • requires no justification • will please examiners • In qualitative research use questions • Recall or make use of prior work • hypothesis/questions should use this • Conclusions should hint at prediction

  12. Questions to ask yourself • Have I covered all the angles? • Why these particular examples? • Why these interviewees? • Are all the suspects included? • Is this induction or deduction? • How could my hypothesis be disproved?

More Related