Primary MCQ Course Evaluation
160 likes | 286 Vues
This report presents the mean scores from the Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluated over three days (January 23-25, 2012) with a maximum score of 5. A total of 34 candidates participated, and their feedback was collected via bar charts representing various subjects: Pharmacology, Physics, and Physiology. Overall, the course was well-received, with attendees commending the clarity, organization, and effectiveness of the instruction. Comments highlighted the quality of presentations and the usefulness of practice materials, with suggestions for improvements noted.
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation January 2012
Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar graphs. Total no. candidates:34 Mean score, maximum being 5
Day1 :23rd January 2012 Mean score, maximum being 5
Day 2 :24th January 2012 Mean score, maximum being 5
Day 3: 25th January2012 Mean score, maximum being 5
Overall value of the course 1= waste of money/time, 5 being excellent y axis represents number of candidates
Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluation 1: very poor 2: poor 3: Satisfactory 4: good 5: excellent y axis represents number of candidates
Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluation 1: very poor 2: poor 3: Satisfactory 4: good 5: excellent y axis represents number of candidates
Value of pre-course MCQ Practice1= very poor, 5 being excellent y axis represents number of candidates
Comments: Pharmacology • Very clear and good introduction Clear and concise, good slides • Well presented, answered questions well, Very clear, good explanation • Good slides - good explanations of answers - concise • Very knowledgeable Excellent Very good! Explained every answers whether T or F
Comments: Physics • Good slides, well presented Excellent, should have been in the morning when we are fresh • Extremely useful Very informative, knew topic very well. Clarified ambiguities I had • Well explained Good to have SBA practice • Good All well presented, answered questions appropriately
Comments: Physiology • Much better day. Good speaker - all clear and a sense of humor! Good explanation of answers. Excellent, clear and concise and enjoyable! Answered questions, very knowledgeable • Very approachable, clear answers to questions asked Excellent Thank you! The presentation was very clear, easy to understand and follow
Comments:General • Lecture handouts are something that I feel really lacked, in order to help keep up the material. • Turning point SBA devices were great fun, interactive and helpful. • Very well organised with a lot of effort put in to organise the course. • High quality teaching, very informed lecturers.. Mean score, maximum being 5
Comments:General • Practice papers very useful, questions very challenging • Good length (3 days) • Dr xx has written good SBA's in preparation for exam, majority topics covered would like more cardiovascular and respiratory physiology questions. Mean score, maximum being 5
Post exam feedback • Thanks for all your support during and after the course • pharmacology MCQs were a little challenging • Many MCQ's and SBA's were totally new • Thanks for all the help for my preparation • SBA questions were tough. Coventry classes were useful. • Thank you for the encouragement. Yes it went well today