1 / 14

S pin A symmetries of the N ucleon E xperiment

Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio at High Q 2 by Using The Double Spin Asymmetries. S pin A symmetries of the N ucleon E xperiment. ( E07-003). Anusha Liyanage Hall C Users Meeting January 23, 2010. CONTENTS. Physics Motivation & HMS Kinematic SANE Layout

nayda-griffith
Télécharger la présentation

S pin A symmetries of the N ucleon E xperiment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Measurement Of the Proton Form Factor Ratio at High Q2 by Using The Double Spin Asymmetries Spin Asymmetries of the Nucleon Experiment ( E07-003) Anusha Liyanage Hall C Users Meeting January 23, 2010

  2. CONTENTS • Physics Motivation & HMS Kinematic • SANE Layout • Analysis Status • SIMC Simulation • Work Status

  3. Physics Motivation & HMS Kinematic For Proton M. Jones et al., PRC74 (2006) 035201 RSS (Jlab) Q2 = 1.5 (GeV/c)2 Dramatic discrepancy ! between Rosenbluth and recoil polarization technique. GeP-III, Hall C

  4. SANE Layout BETA (40°) HMS (14°- 48°) P e- BigCal Polarized Target Lucite Hodoscope ΘP Θe Gas Cherenkov Target Beam position monitor Forward Hodoscope Beam Line B at 80° OR 180°

  5. From The Experiment The calculated asymmetry vsμGE/GM The raw asymmetry, The elastic asymmetry, The beam-target asymmetry, Here, N+= Helicity + Counts N- = Helicity - Counts At Q2=6.259 (GeV/C)2 PB,PT = Beam & Target Pol. f = Dilution Factor Nc = A Correction Term Am = AP = + Nc N+ - N- N+ + N- Am f PBPT PT+= ~71.0% , PT- = ~-65.0%,PB= ~73.0%, Ap = - br SinΘ*CosФ* - aCosΘ* r2 + c r = GE /GM Ap = - bSinΘ*CosФ* r - aCosΘ* c c a, b, c = kinematic factors Θ*,Ф* = pol. and azi. Angles between q and S Θ*≈ 102° and Ф* = 0 From the HMS kinematics, r2 << c

  6. Error Propagation From The Experiment….. ∆Ap = bSinΘ*CosФ* ∆r c Using the experiment data at Q2=6.259 (GeV/C)2, ∆r = 0.118 μ ∆r = 2.79 x 0.118 μ ∆r = 0.3 Where ,μ – Magnetic Moment of the Proton The error on the μ ∆r from the experimental data with total ep events ~1000, μ ∆r = 0.3 Ap = - bSinΘ*CosФ* r - aCosΘ* c c

  7. Analysis Status • HMS Detector Calibration is Completed. • Detector Efficiency. Modification of the DC tracking efficiency algorithm is done. (The tracking efficiency is increased by 15%-20%) • Extracted the elastic events. Correlation corrections are completed.

  8. Tracking Efficiency Corrections Tracking Efficiency Vs Run Number • Used 4/6 DC hits instead of 5/6 DC hits. • Used the tracks which have stubs only on one of the DC’s as good tracks. Drift Chamber hits Vs x focal plane Ch1 Vs hsxfp Ch1 Vs hsxfp Ch2 Vs hsxfp Ch2 Vs hsxfp

  9. Tracking Efficiency Correction Tracking Efficiency Vs x-focal plane Use the Tracking Efficiency as a function of hsxfp to correct data.

  10. Extracted the elastic events Momentum Difference , dPel_hms Q2 = 4M2E2cos2Θ M2+2ME+E2sin2Θ ν = Q2 2M Pcal = Sqrt(ν2 + 2Mν) H M S C O IN Elliptic cut yi = variable ai = offset σi= cut HMS – abs(dPel_hms ) < 0.02 abs(hsdelta) < 8 hcer_npe < 0.2 hsshtrk/hse > 0.01 COIN - abs(EHMS-eclust+0.37) <1 abs(XHMS-xclust-0.15) < 5 abs(YHMS-yclust+0.41) < 10 dPel_hms = PHMS – Pcal Pcent

  11. X/Y position difference X position Difference Y position Difference HMS cuts HMS cuts COIN cuts COIN cuts X_HMS - Xclust Y_HMS - Yclust X/Y_HMS – Predicted X/Y positions (Target Mag. Field Corrected)on the BigCal using the HMS kinematics X/Yclust - Measured X/Y positions on the BigCal Y_HMS - Yclust

  12. Correlation Corrections for …. The dPel_hmsvssrast_y .... The Y position difference Vs srast _y …. dPel_hmsvssrast_y dPe_hmsvssrast_y Ydiff Vs srast_y Corrected dPel_hmsvssrast_y Corrected Ydiff Vs srast_y

  13. SIMC Simulation HMS Single Arm Variables HMS Coincidence with BigCalVariables σ = 0.79 σ = 2.98 σ = 1.69 σ = 4.21 SIMC Simulation σ = 0.0041 Experimental Data σ = 0.0055 SIMC Counts = 1696 Data = 950 • Target Magnetic Field is corrected • Normalized to Charge, Tracking Efff. and Comp. L.T.

  14. Work Status • HMS Calibration – completed • Preliminary elastic event selection – completed To Do ….. • Improve the SIMC simulation • Use the Data which are corrected with the new Tracking Efficiency correction function.(with hsxfp) • Include the new tracking algorithm to the simulation • Use the Efficiency Corrections • Extract the Asymmetry and the GE/GM Ratio

More Related