70 likes | 195 Vues
On September 9, 2001, the New TLD Evaluation Process Planning Task Force (NTEPPTF) presented its charter during the ICANN Public Forum. The focus is on developing a comprehensive plan for the monitoring and evaluation of new Top-Level Domains (TLDs), emphasizing technical, business, and legal aspects. The task force proposes a schedule for execution, including metrics and methodologies for evaluating DNS stability, operational performance, compliance, and consumer protection. Upcoming milestones include drafts for feedback and a final report submission in March 2022.
E N D
New TLD Evaluation Process Planning Task Force Update to ICANN Public Forum Stuart Lynn Sunday, September 9, 2001
NTEPPTF Charter • Develop plan for monitoring and evaluation of new TLDs • Focus on technical, business, legal • Rely on contractually available data • Propose schedule for execution of plan • Present to Board by Montevideo
Jaap Akkerhuis (ccTLD) Sebastien Bachollet (BC) Marilyn Cade (BC) David Conrad (RSSAC) Michael Heltzer (IP) Geoff Houston (PSO) Roberto Laorden (PSO) Stuart Lynn (Chair) Vany Martinez (NCC) Y J Park (NCC) Adrian Pinder (GAC) TASK FORCE MEMBERS
STEPS • Overall approach • Areas for evaluation • Questions for each area • Metrics for each question • Schedule • Methodology
AREAS • Technical • DNS stability and performance • Operational performance • Business • Compliance • Processes • Markets • Processes • Trademarks, cybersquatting, dispute resolution • Consumer • Legal • Agreements and effectiveness of agreements • Process • Selection, negotiation, communications, monitoring
QUESTIONS • Effect on ICANN decisions • Launch new TLDs • Shape character of new TLDs • Is answerable • Measured with available data • Reasonably objective qualitative process • Within useful timeframe • Start-up, steady-state • Separate tracks • Sponsored vs unsponsored • Restricted vs unrestricted
WHAT’S NEXT? • October 10: Post draft questions for feedback • End of October: Post draft report for feedback • Except metrics? • November Meeting: Submit adjusted draft report • Interim recommendations • Mid-January: Post draft metrics for feedback • Mid-February: Post “final” report for feedback • March Meeting: Submit final report