1 / 14

AFCEC Execution & AFIMSC Future

AFCEC Execution & AFIMSC Future. Mr. Joe Sciabica AFCEC Director 7 Oct 2014. FY14 Year of Execution AFIMSC Way Forward. FY14 Execution. $2.4 billion total program execution $400 million more than in FY13 $380 million spent 11 Sep to EOY Summary of Major Programs

neil-mercer
Télécharger la présentation

AFCEC Execution & AFIMSC Future

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AFCEC Execution & AFIMSC Future Mr. Joe Sciabica AFCEC Director 7 Oct 2014

  2. FY14 Year of Execution • AFIMSC Way Forward

  3. FY14 Execution • $2.4 billion total program execution • $400 million more than in FY13 • $380 million spent 11 Sep to EOY • Summary of Major Programs • $895 million for 611 FSRM projects • Dover AFB and Minot AFB runways • HQ CENTCOM and HQ PACAF • $879 million for 39 MILCON projects • $78 million to MAJCOMS for emerging needs • $386 million Environmental Restoration program • $183 million for 131 BRAC projects

  4. FY14 Execution • O&M comprised 83% of budget • $269 million for Env Quality • $112 million for Energy • $82 million for Civilian Pay • $66 million for Readiness • $34 million for Operations • $9.5 million for Installations • $202 million for non-AF customers; DLA design, FSRM and other programs

  5. IPL Program • Rolled out first 2-year Integrated Priorities List in Aug • In FY15/16, every requirement competes on own merit in unified, standard & simplified risk-based model • Model is based on: Risk to Mission/Force; Alignment to Air Force Priorities; and Cost Savings • Key to Victory for Construction Tasking Order • Sustainable, Well-Communicated Process • Early Visibility of IPL (next FY sked to be out 15 Apr) • Reduced Risk • Communication and Collaboration

  6. IPL Program • Risk to Mission/Force • Probability of Failure = Condition • Consequence of Failure = • Facility/Infrastructure’s Mission • Commander’s Priority • Alignment to Air Force Priorities • MAJCOM Cmdr assessment • Air Force Senior Leadership (Pentagon) ensures strategic alignment with top AF priorities notional requirements distribution Consequence of Failure Probability of Failure • Cost Savings • Special prioritization given to requirements with cost avoidance and rapid return on investment (consolidation, energy conservation, reduced maintenance)

  7. Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center

  8. AFIMSC • Stood up Provisional AFIMSC in Aug • MG “TC” Carter, commander • Operating at Joint Base Andrews • Team of 65 drafting PAD/CONOPS • Orgs realigned 1 Oct to AFMC/AFIMSC(P) • Air Force Civil Engineer Center • Air Force Financial Services Center • Air Force Installation Contracting Agency • Air Force Security Forces Center • Financial Mgmnt Center of Expertise (AFCAA) • Services Directorate (AFPC)

  9. AFIMSC Strategic Context: Centralization of management support to maximum extent possible improves Air Force efficiency and effectiveness in providing installation and expeditionary combat support capabilities to wing commanders and mission partners

  10. AFIMSC Support functions currently spread across MAJCOM staffs will be centralized at AFIMSC, allowing delivery of standardized levels of service across the Air Force Centralizing under Air Force Materiel Command reduces overhead by combining installation functions currently performed by MAJCOMs It makes good business sense for AF to centralize installation support the way it already centralizes other functions like science and technology, test, and sustainment

  11. AFIMSC • Installation support capabilities: • Base Communications • Civil Engineering • Installation Ministry Programs • Logistics Readiness • Operational Contracting • Security Forces • Services

  12. AFIMSC KEY CRITERIA: Studying locations of current MAJCOMS and locations with 50 or more assigned to FOA that’s joining AFIMSC • 10 Candidate HQ Locations • Barksdale AFB, LA • Ellsworth AFB, SD • Hurlburt Field, FL • Joint Base Andrews, MD • Joint Base Langley, VA • Joint Base San Antonio, TX • Peterson AFB, CO • Scott AFB, IL • Tyndall AFB, FL • Wright-Patterson AFB, OH

  13. DISCUSSION

More Related