1 / 14

URBANIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHEAST ASIA

URBANIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHEAST ASIA. Gavin W. Jones JY Pillay Comparative Asia Research Centre, Global Asia Institute, National University of Singapore. Main points. SE Asia is more urbanized than the figures show

nellie
Télécharger la présentation

URBANIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHEAST ASIA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. URBANIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHEAST ASIA Gavin W. Jones JY Pillay Comparative Asia Research Centre, Global Asia Institute, National University of Singapore

  2. Main points • SE Asia is more urbanized than the figures show • Where do the urban populations live? Giant cities? Intermediate cities? Small towns? • Analysis of mega-urban region dynamics • Development of mega-urban corridors • Are SE Asian cities distinctive? Or is a Los Angelization” taking place? • How are cities viewed by governments in power?

  3. Southeast Asian countries: trends in % urban Source: UN Population Division, 2011. The Indonesian figures for 2010, 2020 and 2030 are in brackets because they are clearly too low compared with the measured 2010 figure of 49.0.

  4. Asian urban population by five population size groups (per cent) Source: Zlotnik, 2004

  5. Percentage of urban population in four population size groups Source: Calculated from UN Population Division, 2011.

  6. Phases of Metropolitan Expansion

  7. Basic data on the Asian mega-urban regions, 1990 and 2000 Note: Ho Chi Minh City populations are for 1989 and 1999. Source: Jones and Douglass (eds), 2008, Table 3.1.

  8. Non-core regions of the MUR: share of MUR population 1990 and 2000 and share of MUR population growth 1990-2000 Source: Jones and Douglass (eds), 2008, Table 3.2

  9. Share of MURs in national populations (%) Source: Jones and Douglass, 2008, Table 3.3.

  10. Population growth rate in the MUR, compared with country or region population growth rate and urban population growth rate * Including non-urban parts of the MUR Source: Jones and Douglass, 2008, Table 3.4

  11. Comparison of Mumbai with some large Asian mega-urban regions: population of core, and population density in different zones, 2000 • Data for 2001 • Source: For Jakarta, Bangkok, Manila and Shanghai, Jones, 2008, Table 3.1. For Mumbai, Bhagat and Jones, 2013, Tables 1 and 4. • Inner zone includes: for Mumbai, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM); for Jakarta, the DKI Jakarta; for Bangkok, most of the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) plus part of Nonthaburi Province; for Manila, Metro Manila; for Shanghai, Districts 1-9, plus densely settled parts of surrounding districts contiguous to the nine districts.

  12. Seats won by BarisanNasionaland Pakatan Rakyat by size of electorate in Peninsular Malaysia in 2013. Source: Adapted from Lee, 2013, Table 6.

  13. Contribution of net migration to population change, 1990-2000 (%) Source: Jones and Douglass, 2008, Table 3.5

  14. Thank you

More Related