1 / 25

Transforming Learning Management Systems through Effective Pedagogy

This paper explores how pedagogy can reshape Learning Management Systems (LMS) in higher education, focusing on key transformation elements such as recognition, selection, conversion, integration, implementation, and adaptation. Faculty experiences from Luther College, St. Olaf College, and Macalester College are highlighted, showcasing the collaborative efforts across institutions. The paper emphasizes the importance of understanding faculty needs and student engagement in selecting the right LMS, as well as challenges and solutions associated with promoting effective use of technology in teaching.

nemo
Télécharger la présentation

Transforming Learning Management Systems through Effective Pedagogy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Closer to the Dream: Letting Pedagogy Transform Learning Management Systems Ryan Gjerde – Luther College Bob Puffer – Luther College Dan Beach – St. Olaf College Barron Koralesky – Macalester College

  2. Seven Elements of LMS Transformation Recognition Inclusion Selection Conversion Integration Implementation Adaptation

  3. Bob PufferLuther Collegepuffro01@luther.edu

  4. Luther College - Recognition • Increases in software licensing • Concerns about software quality • Barriers to adaptability and integration • Need for increased capability

  5. Luther College – Selection • WHAT DO WE NEED? Faculty survey of LMS usage • WHAT’S OUT THERE? Edutools –www.edutools.info/course/compare • WHERE’S THE BEST FIT? • Xplana evaluation – reduce to top six • Reduce to top three and test on-site for:

  6. Luther College - Selection • Commercial or opensource? • Barriers to opensource adoption: • Support • Stability • Longevity • Accountability • Modifying complex code

  7. Luther College – Adaptation • The ‘M’ in Moodle – “Modular” • Moodle development community - “Martin and the Twelve Heads” • Owner-enhanced

  8. Dan BeachSt. Olaf Collegebeach@stlolaf.edu

  9. Selection • Determined what faculty were using and why • Asked what people wanted • Compared several systems via www.edutools.info/course/compare/ • Moodle stood out • Set up a testing server

  10. Integration/Implementation • Database choice (PostgreSQL) • Authentication via LDAP • Create a Moodle course for every class

  11. Integration/Implementation • Automatically enroll students into classes • Import college ID photos • Training sessions for IT support group

  12. Implementation • Announced decision to the campus • Offered training seminars • Self-taught • Quicklink

  13. Outcome • Students grabbed onto it first • "I think Moodle is interesting and I wish more classes would use it. It’s easier to have assignments posted online …” • "It’s kind of cool to see who’s in your classes. It seems like it’s still a new thing for professors, since I have only one class using it. We use the forum for class a lot and it seems like there’s a lot of possibilities with Moodle." -from the Manitou Messenger (student newspaper)

  14. Outcome • 65-75 faculty currently using it • 150+ classes this semester • Just-in-Time-Teaching (JITT) • FERPA • Expanding uses

  15. Barron KoraleskyMacalester Collegekoralesky@macalester.edu

  16. Recognition – Motivation • Macalester didn’t have a CMS • New faculty arrive expecting CMS • Students too!

  17. Inclusion - Campus-wide collaboration is critical • Instructional technologists • Web coordinator • Librarians • Central IT – Networking, Database • Faculty development center • Early adopter faculty

  18. Selection – Why Moodle? • Needed a CMS to try • Rising use in our peer group • Open source • Apache, mySQL, PHP

  19. Selection – Pilot program • Started just two weeks before fall semester 2004 • Few hour initial setup • LDAP authentication = piece of cake

  20. Selection – Pilot program • Grew fast – outgrew server right away • 1st semester = 20% of our users! • 2nd semester = 50% of our users!

  21. Inclusion–Faculty Development • Fall Teaching & Learning Seminar – Moving your courses online • Pedagogically (not technically) focused • Why you want to use the method, less on how • Get faculty “talking about teaching” • Fluid syllabus • Web-based reading reflections • Facilitating out of class discussions • Online assessment

  22. Inclusion–Faculty Development • Faculty Moodle Workshop • ½ hr pedagogically focused introduction • Led by faculty • Again, more why • 1.5 hr hands-on with IS support • Lunch • ~20% faculty in 2 sessions

  23. Integration & Adaptation • Pilot to fully supported • Automatic course creation • Automatic course enrollment • Bring content into courses • e.g. relevant library links • Other modules

  24. Integration & Implementation • New faculty/student orientation • Information Fluency program • Use by other campus groups • ~75% of students using Moodle

  25. More information • http://moodle.org • http://moodle.macalester.edu • http://moodle.stolaf.edu • http://katie.luther.edu • Username = educause • Password = educause

More Related