1 / 20

CRITIQUES OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE RESPONSE OF SAN FRANCISCO

CRITIQUES OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE RESPONSE OF SAN FRANCISCO. Mary O'Brien Annual Fall Conference Western Regional Pollution Prevention Network October 16, 2003 . Alternatives Assessment. Considering the pros and cons of a full range of alternatives to harm.

neo
Télécharger la présentation

CRITIQUES OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE RESPONSE OF SAN FRANCISCO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CRITIQUES OF THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE AND THE RESPONSE OF SAN FRANCISCO Mary O'Brien Annual Fall Conference Western Regional Pollution Prevention Network October 16, 2003

  2. Alternatives Assessment Considering the pros and cons of a full range of alternatives to harm

  3. Precautionary Principle A commitment to valuing health over harm amid uncertainty

  4. For every NO to harm there is a YES to health

  5. Five critiques of the Precautionary Principle are common: • The Precautionary Principle is vague • The PP is a value, not science • The PP stifles progress • The PP requires a risk-free world • The PP throws out risk assessment; alternatives might cause more harm

  6. Critique #1: The Precautionary Principle is vague Response : San Francisco clearly states regarding the Precautionary Principle: Why How Who Where What When

  7. WHY General welfare "...that individuals and communities can live healthy, fulfilling, and dignified lives"

  8. Who • Government • Residents • Citizen Groups • Businesses

  9. What City ordinances and decisions

  10. How • A public process • Make choices among available alternatives based on questions of: • necessity of hazardous activities options • least possible damage

  11. Where "...such areas as transportation, construction, land use, planning, water, energy, health care, recreation, purchasing, and public expenditure."

  12. When • Historically • Now • With a three year review

  13. Critique #2:   The Precautionary Principle is a value, not science Response: The San Francisco Precautionary Principle is value and science ● Value "Individuals and communities living healthy, fulfilling, and dignified lives" ● Science "Careful assessment of available alternatives using the best available science"

  14. Critique #3:   The Precautionary Principle stifles progress Response: The San Francisco Precautionary Principle encourages: ● Technological progress ● Behavioral progress

  15. TECHNOLOGICAL PROGRESS "Science and technology are creating new solutions to prevent or mitigate environmental problems"

  16. BEHAVIORAL PROGRESS "Achieving a society living respectfully within the bounds of nature will take a behavioral...revolution"

  17. Critique #4:The Precautionary Principle requires a risk-free world Response: The San Francisco Precautionary Principle requires less harm: ● "Select the alternative with the least potential impact on human health and the environment“ ● "A duty to consider all the reasonablyforeseeable costs [of alternatives]"

  18. Critique #5:The Precautionary Principle throws out risk assessment; alternatives might cause more harm Response: The San Francisco Precautionary Principle assesses risks and benefits of alternatives: ● "The Precautionary Principle requires a thorough exploration and a careful analysis of a wide range of alternatives" ● "Short and long-term benefits and time thresholds should be considered"

  19. ESSENTIAL ELEMENTSOF PRECAUTIONARY POLICY[regardless of what it is called] • Giving health the benefit of doubt • Public participation • Alternatives assessment • Scientific and technological information

  20. "How do we care for all the children, of all the species, for all time?" -- William McDonough

More Related