1 / 11

Directions for Strengthening the Agency's Assistance to Countries Considering or Introducing Nuclear Power

Directions for Strengthening the Agency's Assistance to Countries Considering or Introducing Nuclear Power. Technical Meeting/Workshop on: TOPICAL ISSUES ON INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT: MANAGING THE DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER Vienna, 9-12 February 2010.

nibaw
Télécharger la présentation

Directions for Strengthening the Agency's Assistance to Countries Considering or Introducing Nuclear Power

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Directions for Strengthening the Agency'sAssistance to Countries Considering orIntroducing Nuclear Power Technical Meeting/Workshop on: TOPICAL ISSUES ON INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT:MANAGING THE DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FORNUCLEAR POWER Vienna, 9-12 February 2010 A. Mc Donald Program Liaison Officer IAEA a.mcdonald@iaea.org

  2. Background • Rising expectations • Increase in countries considering or introducing nuclear power • Growing demand for Agency services • Should they be expanded? • More of the same? • New services?

  3. Background • Paper intended to structure the possibilities for possible discussion by • Member States • Others

  4. 3 service categories • Capacity building • (including training, guidance, information and support networks) to strengthen the basis for well informed national decisions and choices among technologies, technology providers and service providers • Peer reviews • to provide assessments and assurance regarding the quality and comprehensiveness of a State’s preparations for a nuclear power programme • Direct assistance • with specific implementation tasks, including management of projects in limited specific areas

  5. 4 customer categories • Governments • Utilities • Mining undertakings and companies • Research reactor organizations

  6. Challenges • Assuring timely response • Staffing (recruiting competition) • In-house • External experts • Funding (customer, extra-budgetary, regular budget, combinations) • Agency features • Services at cost, independent • Expansion needs study of legal, financial and practical obligations

  7. Outcome of a meeting held 8 February • Conclusion • Agency should provide broad assistance in phase 1 • Agency should be careful about direct assistance in phase 2 and beyond • 10 recommendations

  8. 10 recommendations • Develop policy statement on services to be offered • Better define “services” and “direct assistance” • Consider “programme management” from perspective of developing NP programme: consider senior executive course. • Develop standard pre-feasibility and feasibility study definition

  9. 10 recommendations • Develop evaluation of industry • On bid evaluation, limit Agency service to process • On finance, need dedicated consultancy and be very careful beyond phase 1 • Avoid conflict of interest on peer review and direct assistance

  10. 10 recommendations • Develop a peer review service for workforce planning • For “direct assistance”, consider two options • Direct consultant provider • Clearinghouse

  11. IAEA …atoms for peace.

More Related