1 / 24

Peer-to-Peer Based Multimedia Distribution Service

Peer-to-Peer Based Multimedia Distribution Service. Zhe Xiang, Qian Zhang, Wenwu Zhu, Zhensheng Zhang IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 6, No. 2, April 2004 Presented by Ho Tsz Kin 14/04/2004. Agenda. Introduction Architecture Topology-ware Overlay Replication Strategies

nickolas-macris
Télécharger la présentation

Peer-to-Peer Based Multimedia Distribution Service

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Peer-to-Peer Based Multimedia Distribution Service Zhe Xiang, Qian Zhang, Wenwu Zhu, Zhensheng ZhangIEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 6, No. 2, April 2004 Presented by Ho Tsz Kin14/04/2004

  2. Agenda • Introduction • Architecture • Topology-ware Overlay • Replication Strategies • Intergroup Replication • Intragroup Replication • Performance Evaluation • Conclusion

  3. Multimedia distribution services • Centralized multimedia distribution • Mirroring, Proxy caching • Bottleneck bandwidth problem • Measurement between University of Washington and a set of 13,656 servers • Over 90% is less than 10 Mbps • Not scalable • Content distribution network (CDN) • Deploys a large number of servers at the edge of the network • Objective is to efficiently redirect user requests to appropriate servers so that request latency is reduced and load among servers are balanced

  4. Multimedia distribution services • Capacity of the edge server is not large enough to support multimedia service • Where and when to place those edge servers is a difficult problem • Peer-to-peer network • Some rely on servers to disseminate information • Single point of failure • Overlay network in a P2P system is not aware of the underlying topology • Availability depend on peer’s reliability • Cannot provide good QoS-provision • Propose a novel framework based on P2P network

  5. Architecture Client join the P2P network, and contribute resources Determine how many replicas and how they place Determine grouping among peers

  6. Topology-aware Overlay • Routing overhead is a key performance metric • If randomly constructed, overlay network may actually be far away in the underlying network • Nearby peers in the underlying network are clustered into groups • A group consists of a set of nodes that are close to each other • Close means if the distance is less than some predefined value • Distance can be network latency, or round trip time

  7. Topology-aware Overlay • Two different groups are communicating with each other through the shortest distance • Predefined distance threshold • Given a certain transmission delay requirement

  8. Content delivery • When a request to obtain certain content is issued • Found within the same group • Content can be directly distributed to the requesting peer • Peer may decide to replicate according to the replication strategies • Not found, flooding search is carried out • A shortest communication path is setup between two groups • The content in source will first be sent to some host in target group, that host in target group will send the content to requester

  9. Replication Strategies • Global level replication decision • relies on complete information about the network such as distances between groups or between peers, storage capacity of each group, and each peer • such global information is difficult to obtain in a distributed environment • Divide the problem into two sub-problems • Intergroup and Intragroup replication

  10. Intergroup Replication • Provide low latency and QoS-aware service within group level • Seed • Group-level replica • Number of seeds = number of groups holding this • Seed capacity is the total capacity of a group to store different seed • Minimize • the average distance between requesting group and the group providing content • Subject to • the constraint of each group’s seed capacity

  11. Intergroup Replication • Variation of K-center problem • NP-Complete • Ignore seed capacity of each group, and only consider the totally seed capacity • Idea of heuristic Seed of each content ci should be uniformly distributed over the network, let number be L Average distance L 2D Euclidean space

  12. Intergroup Replication • Average access distance • Modified problem, with S is total capacity, popularity of content ci is ri Weighted average minimum distance Storage capacity constraints • Applying Lagrange Function

  13. Intergroup Replication • Substitute back to find the average distance • Proposed heuristic • If distance between the requestor and the peer who has a replica is larger than , then replicate Estimated using local information

  14. Intragroup Replication • Improving the availability of the content • Replica is copies of the content within the group • Replica replication matrix • Availability of content ci N peers Reliability of pj

  15. Intragroup Replication • Optimization problem • Variation of the knapsack problem • NP-complete size of content ci storage capacity of peer pj

  16. Intragroup Replication • Proposed heuristic • Climb-hill based algorithm • Adding a new replica for content cr will improve its availability • Deleting the stored contents cj also decreases its availability • A(cr): availability of content cr • A’(ci):availability of content ci if we delete this content • If A’(ci) > A(cr) • Deleting ci does not conflict with the objective

  17. Performance Evaluation • Network topology • Euclidean space model • Nodes are randomly located • Edge longitudes are fixed as 3000 ms • 200 groups are generated • Latency within group are very small • Packet loss model mainly due to the congestion occurred at routers • Number of hops between two peers increases linearly to the distance between two peers • Largest hop is ten • Bandwidth of link range from 800 Kbps to 1.4 Mbps, and average is about 1.2 Mbps

  18. Performance Evaluation • Content distribution • 10,000 MPEG-4 format video clips encoded in 1.28 Mbps • Length follows a normal distribution in range of 3 min to 5 min, correspondingly to 37.8 MB to 48 MB in files sizes • Request distribution • Zipf distribution • Truncated Geometric Distribution (TGD) • Truncated Pareto Distribution (TPD)

  19. Performance Evaluation • Peer Storage capacity and reliability • Storage contributed by a peer follows a normal distribution in the range of 300 MB and 2 GB, which approximately supports 8 to 50 video clips • Peer reliability of sustaining service follows normal distribution in the range of 0.1 to 0.9 • Comparison • Freenet • Always makes a replica for each requested content • LRU replacement policy • Random replication system • Contents are uniformly distributed into peer’s storage

  20. Performance Evaluation • Performance metrics • Average latency • Average access distance between the requestor peer and the content provider peer • Video quality • Perceived video quality by the client • PSNR • Weighted availability • Represents the service availability provided by contents in a certain area (within distance d) • Defined as:

  21. Performance Evaluation • Average latency • Varying number of content from 8000 to 12500 • Varying skew factor with 10000 content

  22. Performance Evaluation • Video quality • Varying peer storage • Varying average packet loss ratio of network links with peer storage capacity as 960 MB

  23. Performance Evaluation • Availability • Varying distance d

  24. Conclusion • Propose and analyze • A topology-aware overlay • Replication strategies • Intergroup replication • Intragroup replication • Comments: • Assume equal sizes in intergroup replication, but different sizes in intragroup replication • Topology-aware techniques can also be applied to clustering in SLVoD • How to formulate and resolve stripping strategies

More Related