Monitoring MET DQM Study Results from CRAFT Data

Summary from MET DQM Plot Scanning METDQM Study

MET DQM Plots From CRAFT data https://cmsweb.cern.ch/dqm/tier-0/ JetMET POG DQM is already routinely run METDQM Study

Run 66594 With HF Lumi Section Number of events Barrel+Endcap Only Lumi Section Number of events METPhi (rad) MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) First few lumi sections appear to be problematic. METDQM Study

Zoom-in view Problem only in a first few lumi sections On a lumi section based method, can keep the majority of events Run 66594 cont’d METDQM Study

Data certification Looking at Chi2 of double Gaussian fits: reduced chi2 <20 (lum section) or 200 (entire run) (Need to adjust the criteria based on the statistics) Mean of the fitted Gaussian form: within +-10 GeV Run 66594 cont’d METDQM Study

Run 66714 With HF Lumi Section Number of events Barrel+Endcap Only Lumi Section Number of events MEy (GeV) METPhi (rad) MEx (GeV) No major problem. METDQM Study

Run 66714 cont’d • Data certification output Good run METDQM Study

Run 66746 With HF Lumi Section Noise in HF at phi~0.8 Number of events Barrel+Endcap Only Lumi Section Number of events METPhi (rad) MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) Check of the mean MEx or MEy will detecot this problem. METDQM Study

Run 66746 cont’d • Data certification output MET without HF mostly OK METDQM Study

Run 67124 With HF Lumi Section Number of events Barrel+Endcap Only Lumi Section Number of events METPhi (rad) MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) met with/withtou HF seem to suffer from hot tower(s) METDQM Study

Run 67124 cont’d • Data certification outputs Bad Run METDQM Study

Run 68021 With HF Lumi Section Number of events Barrel+Endcap Only Lumi Section Number of events METPhi (rad) MEx (GeV) MEy (GeV) No major problem. METDQM Study

Run 68021 cont’d • Data certification outputs METDQM Study

Monitoring MET DQM Study Results from CRAFT Data