1 / 7

Cross-disciplinary methods for understanding experience

Clare Hooper from Eindhoven University of Technology presents a comparison between two cross-disciplinary methods for understanding experiences: Teasing Apart, Piecing Together (TAPT) and Context Mapping (CM). TAPT emphasizes emotional and social insights through participant engagement and preparatory packages, while CM focuses on group-generated ideas. Both methods yield tacit knowledge but differ in their application and speed. This insightful analysis helps in choosing the appropriate method for various research needs, from understanding diverse individual experiences to group improvement initiatives.

nile
Télécharger la présentation

Cross-disciplinary methods for understanding experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cross-disciplinary methods for understanding experience Clare Hooper, Eindhoven University of Technology

  2. Teasing Apart,Piecing Together (TAPT)

  3. Teasing Apart,Piecing Together (TAPT)

  4. Context Mapping • Preparation • Sensitization: participants are sent packages to trigger, encourage, and motivate them to think about the area in question • Meetings in which participants do generative exercises • Analysis • Communicate results Image: http://www.rebuildlakeshore.com/2007/06/16/the-07-summer-team/

  5. Comparison • Ease of use • No big issues (but TAPT is quicker!) Email: c.j.hooper@tue.nl Twitter: @clarejhooper

  6. Comparison • Ease of use • No big issues (but TAPT is quicker!) • Type of insight • Both yield tacit knowledge • TAPT strong at emotional/social aspects • CM strong for group generation of ideas Email: c.j.hooper@tue.nl Twitter: @clarejhooper

  7. Comparison • Ease of use • No big issues (but TAPT is quicker!) • Type of insight • Both yield tacit knowledge • TAPT strong at emotional/social aspects • CM strong for group generation of ideas • How to choose? • TAPT for: understanding diverse individual experiences; compare and contrast; redesign • CM to ask “How do we improve this thing?” Email: c.j.hooper@tue.nl Twitter: @clarejhooper

More Related