1 / 19

2011 Time and Motion Study

2011 Time and Motion Study. Judicial Council Judicial Workload Assessment Committee. Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Research, Planning, and Data Analysis. Recap. March 1 – 31 Criminal, civil, and accountability cases Administrative time

nira
Télécharger la présentation

2011 Time and Motion Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2011 Time and MotionStudy Judicial Council Judicial Workload Assessment Committee Administrative Office of the Courts Office of Research, Planning, and Data Analysis

  2. Recap • March 1 – 31 • Criminal, civil, and accountability cases • Administrative time • Thanks for your participation and leadership

  3. Overview Participation Validity

  4. Total Minutes 20062011 501,815 1,027,380

  5. Highlights Average working day 7.6 hours Jury trial events per judge 22.8 hours Pro Se Event Totals

  6. Criminal

  7. General Civil

  8. Domestic Relations

  9. Supplemental Data

  10. Clerk Disposition Report Update • Clerk Disposition Report distributed on March 1 • Reports due to Council of Superior Court Clerks on April 15 • As of May 19, we are missing 25 counties • 2 have sent printouts • May 30 is deadline for reports to be included in study/workload assessment

  11. Workload Assessment Timeline

  12. Decision Points • Clerk Disposition Reports • Options for proceeding without complete data • Sampling • Aggregation to state level • Death Penalty Habeas Corpus • Staff recommends Delphi survey of assigned judges

  13. Decision Points • Judge-year Values • Staff recommends revisiting these due to changes in state demographics and new travel data • Accountability Courts • Staff recommends further analysis of data • Supplemental Data • Staff recommends using data to inform a more detailed study of magistrates, SBDs, and law clerks

  14. Questions

More Related