1 / 5

GEF Strategic Priorities in International Waters

GEF Strategic Priorities in International Waters. Nick Remple RBEC Environment and Energy Practice Workshop, Almaty, Kazakhstan. 6-9 October 2004. What makes IW portfolio distinct. No single convention like all other Focal Areas Large majority of projects are multi-country

noah-dunn
Télécharger la présentation

GEF Strategic Priorities in International Waters

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GEF Strategic Priorities in International Waters Nick Remple RBEC Environment and Energy Practice Workshop, Almaty, Kazakhstan. 6-9 October 2004

  2. What makes IW portfolio distinct • No single convention like all other Focal Areas • Large majority of projects are multi-country • About half co-implemented w/UNEP, WB or both • Large majority are UN agency executed; UNOPS about 50% • Handful executed by intergovernmental organizations (Convention Secretariats) • Majority have associated regional convention (some GEF supported); GEF is ‘proxy’ financial mechanism for many moribund regional seas and river basin conventions • UNDP has very good working relations with GEFSEC and both IA’s • Partnerships are key element to our success (incl. w/EEAs) • Many have components in other focal areas (esp. BD, LD, some POPs) • UNDP largest of 3 IA’s in cumulative IW allocation (~42%)

  3. Operational Programmes • OP8 – Waterbody – based • TDA/SAP • degraded waterbodies - restoration • LME, Lake & river basin Components • OP9 – Integrated Land & Water/Multiple Focal Area • TDA/SAP • Prevention vs. restoration • Integrated land & water resource management approaches • Land Degradation, SIDS and MFA Components (esp. BD, CC) • OP10 – Contaminants – based • LBA demonstrations • Global Contaminants (mercury, POPs, endocrine disruptors…) • Ship-related Contaminants – Marine Electronic Highway, ship invasives • Regional/Global Technical Support

  4. Strategic Priorities IW-1. SAP Implementation: - Catalyze financial resource mobilization for implementation of reforms and stress reduction measures agreed through TDA-SAP or equivalent processes for particular transboundary systems IW-2. Expand TDA/SAP: Africa, Water scarcity, Overfishing; also Targeted Learning: - Expand global coverage of foundational capacity building addressing the two key program gaps with a focus on cross-cutting aspects of African transboundary waters and support for targeted learning. IW-3. Innovative demos: contaminants, water scarcity; PPP – access to water, sanitation: - Undertake innovative demonstrations for reducing contaminants and addressing water scarcity issues with a focus on engaging the private sector and testing public-private partnerships.

  5. Strategic Priority FY03-05 S.P. Target ($) FY03-05 S.P. Target (# of waterbodies) 1 – SAP Implementation $121 m. 9 2 - Expand TDA/SAP: Africa, Water scarcity, Overfishing; also Targeted Learning $79 m. 5 3- Innovative demos: contaminants, water scarcity; PPP – access to water, sanitation $60 m. 8 demos/PPP

More Related