1 / 15

A model for expanded PhD production in East Africa

A model for expanded PhD production in East Africa. Marc Cutright, EdD Benedict Mtasiwa , PhD ANIE Conference, Addis Ababa, 2-4 October 2013. Objectives of the model. A ccelerate the production of PhDs and other terminal degrees at East African universities, for service to universities

noma
Télécharger la présentation

A model for expanded PhD production in East Africa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A model for expanded PhD production in East Africa Marc Cutright, EdD Benedict Mtasiwa, PhD ANIE Conference, Addis Ababa, 2-4 October 2013

  2. Objectives of the model • Accelerate the production of PhDs and other terminal degrees at East African universities, for service to universities • Focus production on disciplines of high need and demand • Strengthen the capacity of African university doctoral programs beyond the duration of the formal project.

  3. Contexts of the shortage • Rapid expansion of higher education • Number of institutions exploding • Growing population of young people, particularly those with secondary qualifications • National social and economic development needs dependent upon skilled individuals • University capabilities for teaching and research compromised by severe shortages of advanced degree holders.

  4. Some contributing factors • Aging and retiring professoriate • Inability of universities to attract and retain the most highly qualified personnel • Brain drain, both external and internal • Insufficient capacity of African universities to produce new PhDs

  5. One common model to produce PhDs • A university identifies promising staff members, and sends them to Europe, North America, Asia, or other places to earn terminal degrees.

  6. What’s wrong with that? • First, identify some of the best people—and then “take them off-line” for three or more years. • Expensive • Non-strategic in terms of prioritizing particular disciplines. • Issues of non-return of individuals, or short returns to meet minimum return-service obligations. • The practices perpetuate North-South relationships in which the South is the “junior partner.” E.g., research agendas tend to be those of the North, with the South as data gatherers. • There is no development of African university capacities in doctoral education and PhD production.

  7. Another model • Create centers of excellence and concentration at African universities, founded in large part on existing capacity. • Identify key disciplines for the unfolding 21st century • Offer doctoral education in a cohort model, of short-term and intensive residencies, complementary distance education, lock-step and minimal common coursework • Select and support students, based on institutional endorsement for long-term contribution

  8. The Partner University Element • Each Center of Excellence university is matched by mutual agreement with a Western, European or other university with great strength in the discipline • The partners design the disciplinary details of implementation, instruction, dissertation supervision, etc. • As the partnership progresses, the innate capacity of the African partner university is permanently enhanced. That is the element of sustainability.

  9. By the numbers: An example • 10 Centers of Excellence and disciplinary priority identified • Intake of 20 nominated & competitively selected students per center. • A goal of 75% completion rates • 10 centers X 20 students X 75% completion rate = 150 new PhD students per completed cycle. Three cycles over 10-12 years in total = … • 450 PhDs in about a decade

  10. Substantial cost factors • The support of the expansion of capacity at Centers of Excellence, so that intake and output of large cohorts is possible • Support of individual students: tuition, travel & accommodation expenses, etc. • Central organization, administration, financial & quality monitoring

  11. Recent developments • The Inter-University Council for East Africa (IUCEA) represents universities in the East African Community nations of Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Rwanda and Burundi • The IUCEA is, essentially, the Ministry of Higher Education for the reborn and forming East African Community. • The IUCEA has evidenced interest, at the staff level, in the model and its implementation.

  12. Next Steps • Further development of a needs analysis, inventory of existing programs with develop potential • Potential funding sources include major foundations with investment interests and histories in East Africa, and the constituent national governments of East Africa • The potential of foundation support is suggested by the fact that Rwanda, Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda were all targeted for investment by the Partnership for Higher Education in Africa (2000-2010), and by the IUCEA’s ongoing relationships with potential funders.

  13. The Planning Period • Just a “few details” remain to be resolved ;-) • How are centers identified and prioritized? Considerations include existing capacity, interest in participation in the program and its parameters, the role that disciplinary priorities will play • How to support these centers? Enable new hires, facilitation of university partnerships, etc.? • How to identify, admit, and support accepted students? • How is the program to be centrally administered and quality controlled?

  14. Beyond the launch • Implementation is likely to be modified throughout the program. Will seek support for three iterations, but it should evolve and adapt throughout the implementation phase • Necessary to have good quality controls and “bang for the buck” for funders. • Determine how to shape the experience for the development of HE leadership capacity by graduates • Concentrate on research-based dissemination of the model in practice to support other efforts

  15. Contact information • Marc Cutright, EdD, Associate Professor of Higher Education, The University of North Texas • Marc.Cutright@unt.edu • Ugandan telephone: 0793 200 409

More Related