1 / 7

Growth and Delivery Event Workshop 3 - The Prioritisation of Planning Obligations

Growth and Delivery Event Workshop 3 - The Prioritisation of Planning Obligations. Purpose of Workshop. To understand the current system To consider best practice To establish a degree of consistency across the West of England To understand the impact of future changes Localism Agenda CIL.

nora-odom
Télécharger la présentation

Growth and Delivery Event Workshop 3 - The Prioritisation of Planning Obligations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Growth and Delivery Event Workshop 3 - The Prioritisation of Planning Obligations

  2. Purpose of Workshop • To understand the current system • To consider best practice • To establish a degree of consistency across the West of England • To understand the impact of future changes • Localism Agenda • CIL

  3. The Current Obligations System • West of England and housebuilders both want delivery • All obligations should be: • To navigate development proposals • Policy based • Pass 05/05 tests • Applicants negotiate levels of obligations • Viability is a material consideration for all obligations • Case by case prioritisation • In practice, led by Case Officer but members decision • THIS IS PRIMARILY FOR THE LA TO DECIDE

  4. Best Practice • Some LA’s have clear priorities • Others look on a case by case basis • Prioritisation Matrix • Know practice elsewhere?

  5. Consistency across the WoE • Each UA has different: • Priorities • Political views • Processes • What can be done to achieve a more consistent process?

  6. Potential Future Changes • Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) • Fixed • Non negotiable • Viability tests (?) • Excludes affordable housing • Localism Agenda • How do we get genuine input into the process from the Community?

  7. Delivering Positive change on behalf of our clients for the benefit of their customers

More Related