1 / 15

Center for Developmental Research

Center for Developmental Research. Örebro University , Sweden Maarten van Zalk , Lauree Tilton -Weaver, Margaret Kerr, Håkan Stattin , Nejra van Zalk. Overview. Our main interests Current SIENA studies Main issues & many wishes. Personal interests. Interests.

noreen
Télécharger la présentation

Center for Developmental Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Center for Developmental Research Örebro University, Sweden Maarten van Zalk, LaureeTilton-Weaver, Margaret Kerr, Håkan Stattin, Nejra van Zalk

  2. Overview • Our maininterests • Current SIENA studies • Main issues & manywishes

  3. Personal interests

  4. Interests • Online vs. offlinenetworks (Maarten) • Personality: psychopathictraits, Big Five (Maarten, Margaret) • Externalizing: delinquency, bullying, aggression (Margaret, Håkan, Lauree) • Internalizing: depression, social anxiety (Maarten, Nejra) • Parents, peers, & externalizing (Lauree)

  5. Data • Seven Schools: up to 8 friends in the school (N = 2,500) • PoliticalSocialization Program: Up to 10 friends in school (N = 4,500) • 10-to-18: largecommunity, up to 23 friends, romantic partners, and siblings in the community (N = 4,500) • ONLINE vs.OFFLINE: small community & 89% of all friends foundexclusively online (N = 700) • ALL data alsohave independent parental reports

  6. Recent publications • Kerr, M, Van Zalk, M., Stattin, H. (in press). Psychopathic traits moderate peer influence on delinquency. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. • Van Zalk, N., Van Zalk, M., Kerr, M. & Stattin, H. (in press). Socialization of social anxiety in adolescent crowds: Punks, goths, and other eye-catching peer crowds revisited. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. • Van Zalk, N., Van Zalk, M., Kerr, M. & Stattin, H. (2011). Social anxiety as basis for friendship selection and socialization in a youth social network. Journal of Personality, 29, 499-525. • Van Zalk, M., Kerr, M.. Branje, S., Stattin, Håkan, & Meeus, W. (2010). Peer contagion and adolescent depression: The role of failure anticipation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 39, 837-848. • Van Zalk M., Branje, S. Kerr, M.,Stattin, H., & Meeus, M. (2010). It takes three: Selection, influence, and de-selection processes of depression in adolescent peer networks. Developmental Psychology, 46, 927-938.

  7. Issues & Wishes • Moderation / Interaction effects • Mediation / Indirecteffects

  8. Plotting Simple Slopes • Y' = b1(x1-x1^) + b2(x2-x2^) + b3((x1-x1^)(x2-x2^)) • b1 = IV (parenting-ego estimate)b2 = Moderator (delinquency-alter estimate)b3 = Interaction: parenting-ego×delinquency-alterestimate • For x1^ the average parenting score was used • For x2^ the average delinquency score was used

  9. Moderation • Approach tographing: Plot simple slopes • Is there a user-friendlyway to visualize and test differencesbetweengroups? • Is this the best for two variables with a widerange of values? • Average scores or average for ego/alter? • If only for ego or alters, how do you get this information? • Are ego-alter tables the way to go? • Wish: Function in RSiena that canhelpvisualize interaction effects, visualize the slopes for the differenteffects

  10. Mediation • Processes / mechanismsunderlyingpeerinfluenceeffects • Crucial for understandinghowpeerinfluenceworks • Stages in influence • Indirecteffects

  11. Mediation • Do negative cognitionsmediatepeerinfluence on depressive symptoms? • Traditionalconditions for mediation: • X on Y • X on Z • When X and Z together on Y, only X remains

  12. Mediation • Do negative cognitionsmediatepeerinfluence on depressive symptoms? • Recently: • Indirecteffects of X on Y VIA Z Negative cognitions Friends depr Targets’ depression

  13. Mediation • .74*** • .43*** Negative cognitions • .12*** Average alt Targets’ depression

  14. Mediation • Indirecteffects of X on Y VIA Z • Can weuse a Sobel’s test? • Boots-trapping? • .74*** • .43*** Negative cognitions • .12*** Average alt Targets’ depression

  15. Overview • Our maininterests • Current SIENA studies • Main issues & manywishes

More Related