1 / 21

Harry P. Bahrick & Lynda K. Hall Ohio Wesleyan University

The Importance of Retrieval Failures to Long-Term Retention: A Metacognitive Explanation of the Spacing Effect. Harry P. Bahrick & Lynda K. Hall Ohio Wesleyan University.

normac
Télécharger la présentation

Harry P. Bahrick & Lynda K. Hall Ohio Wesleyan University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Importance of Retrieval Failures to Long-Term Retention: A Metacognitive Explanation of the Spacing Effect Harry P. Bahrick & Lynda K. Hall Ohio Wesleyan University

  2. Mean Percent Decline of Performance On A Final Course Examination in Statistics, Re-administered Within One Year

  3. Overview • Comments regarding research strategy • History of the spacing effect • Limitations of existing theories • Evidence for differential short and long term consequences of spacing • A metacognitive explanation of the spacing effect • Contribution of retrieval failures to the maintenance of knowledge

  4. Comments Regarding Research Strategy • Limitations of the experimental paradigm • Exclusion of variables that can’t be manipulated • Exclusion of phenomena that involve long time periods

  5. History of the Spacing Effect • Methodology • Prior to 1970- Multiple training sessions • After 1970- Single list • Theoretical explanations • 1885-1970 • Work decrement • Anti-consolidation • 1970-present • Diminished processing • Encoding variability

  6. Limitations of Existing Theories • Emphasis on short spacing intervals • Emphasis on short term retention tests • Emphasis on automatic, involuntary processing • Failure to examine differential effects on acquisition versus retention

  7. Evidence for Differential Short and Long Term Consequences of Spacing Percent Correct as a Function of Test Session and Intersession Interval (Bahrick, 1979)

  8. Evidence for Differential Short and Long Term Consequences of Spacing Percent Words Recalled as a Function of Retention Interval and Intersession Interval (Bahrick, Bahrick, Bahrick, & Bahrick, 1993)

  9. A MetacognitiveExplanation of the Spacing Effect • Conscious use of mediators (Bellezza, 1986; Richardson, 1998) • Differential life-span of mediators and encoding strategies • Differential feedback associated with massed versus spaced practice • Evidence of strategy changes during acquisition (Paivio & Yuille, 1969) • Extension of the median life-span of mediators associated with spacing

  10. Experiment 1 The Relation of Spacing to Changes of Encoding Strategy

  11. Acquisition and Retention Percent Correct as a Function of Test Session and Intersession Interval

  12. Reported Strategies Mean Number of Strategy Reports for Session 1

  13. Reported Strategies Mean Number of Strategy Reports for Session 2

  14. Reported Strategies Mean Number of Strategy Reports for Session 3

  15. Reported Strategies Mean Number of Strategy Reports for Session 4

  16. Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analyses with Percent Correct on the Final Recall Test as the Criterion Variable

  17. Experiment 2 The Relation of Spacing to Retrieval Failures and Study Time

  18. Acquisition and Retention ProportionCorrect as a Function of Test Session and Intersession Interval

  19. Mean Study Time Following Successful and Unsuccessful Retrievals

  20. Contribution of Retrieval Failures to the Maintenance of Knowledge Spacing Effect as a Function of Retrieval Failures (Bahrick et al.,1993)

  21. Contribution of Retrieval Failures to the Maintenance of Knowledge • Limitations of the traditional emphasis on successful retrievals • Expanding schedules • Reasons for prior negative assessments of retrieval failures • Recent recognition of the contribution of metacognitive monitoring • Evidence for the contribution of repeated retrieval failures to the spacing effect

More Related