SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Chapter 5 Review PowerPoint

nuala avatar
40 diapositives · 568 Views · Sep 13, 2014

Chapter 5 Review PowerPoint. Characteristics of the Civil Rights Movement. Characteristics of the Civil Rights Movement Non-violent protest Utilization of legislation to eliminate barriers strong leadership…MLK etc Organized, grass root workers. Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Chapter 5 Review PowerPoint - slide 1
01 / 40Chapter 5 Review PowerPoint
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 5 Review PowerPoint
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Chapter 5 Review PowerPoint

  2. Characteristics of the Civil Rights Movement

  3. Characteristics of the Civil Rights Movement • Non-violent protest • Utilization of legislation to eliminate barriers • strong leadership…MLK etc • Organized, grass root workers

  4. Civil Rights Act of 1964

  5. Civil Rights Act of 1964 • Ended discrimination by employers and by places of public service • An attempt to eliminate de facto discrimination

  6. Brown v. Board of Education

  7. Brown v. Board of Education • “Separate but Equal” cast down • ended racial segregation in schools • Equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment • an attempt to eliminate de facto discrimination

  8. De jure discrimination

  9. De jure discrimination • at attempt to eliminate discrimination that is based within our LAWS, • that discrimination which is a proven fact…because it is written down.

  10. De facto discrimination

  11. De facto discrimination • Discrimination based on race, religion, sex, ethnicity, etc. that is within our culture and centered within economic & social biases

  12. The Strict Scrutiny Test

  13. The Strict Scrutiny Test • Used to judge any law that attempts to use racial or ethnic classifications

  14. University of Ca. Regents v. Bakke (1978)

  15. University of Ca. Regents v. Bakke (1978) • Alan Bakke, white, denied entrance to medical school on the basis is of race-based quota • several minorities admitted with lower scores • Decision: Quotas were unconstitutional, but quotas could be used to create a more diverse student population

  16. What was “Busing”?

  17. What was “Busing”? • Shipping students from the school in one area to another area, with the attempt to desegregate schools, faster than society was doing it. • A forced attempt at de facto desegregation • S.C. decisions have limited the crossing of boundaries, allowed the insulation of predominantly white districts • not supported by most white Americans, congress, the president, most governors.

  18. Redlining

  19. Redlining • result of the Civil Rights Act (1968) • banned banks giving mortgages based on where the home is • Now, where one lives, does not disqualify someone from getting a mortgage

  20. Affirmative Action

  21. Affirmative Action • an attempt to eliminate de facto discrimination • blamed for “reverse discrimination” • Created a quota system for education based on one’s race or ethnicity

  22. Reasonable Basis test

  23. Reasonable Basis test • Court test to laws that treat individuals unequally • Such laws may be held constitutional, if its purpose is held to “reasonably” related to a legitimate government interest • Gives the government the benefit of the doubt regarding some laws

  24. The Fourteenth Amendment

  25. The Fourteenth Amendment • Used to stop discrimination • applies to the government • Used by the Supreme Court to apply the issue of civil rights to the states, and beyond the federal government • Does not apply to Wal-mart • or any other business practice

  26. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Country Board of Education (1971)

  27. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Country Board of Education (1971) • Busing of children an appropriate way to integrate schools that were segregated because of past discrimination • applied to the North • triggered violent & massive protests

  28. The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA)

  29. The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) • 1923 - Congress introduces the amendment • Intent was to specifically give equal rights to women, (banned based on sex) • Fails, revised several times, still fails • Resurrected in the early 1970 • fails by three states

  30. The Twenty-fourth Amendment

  31. The Twenty-fourth Amendment • Addressed to eliminate the use of the Poll Tax in voting discrimination • Ratified January 1964 • Similar date to Civil Rights Act

  32. Equal Pay Act of 1963

  33. Equal Pay Act of 1963 • prohibits sex discrimination in salary and wages • Education Amendment added in 1972, prohibits sex discrimination in education

  34. Adarand v. Pena (1995)

  35. Adarand v. Pena (1995) • Adarand Constructors; federal contract awarded to a Hispanic owned company, even though Adarand submitted a lower bid • Decision; Adarand’s favor, reversing Fullilove • outlawed rules that give firm’s an advantage, simply because the owner’s race is that of a people historically discriminated against • remedy must be “narrowly tailored” to the situation • end of an era.

  36. Family & Medical Leave Act (1993)

  37. Family & Medical Leave Act (1993) • provides up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave for employees to care for a new born baby or severely ill family member • Helps establish the idea of comparable worth; • wage scales are set that women and men get equal pay for jobs that involve a similar level of difficulty and require a similar level of training or pay.

  38. Grutler v. Bollinger

  39. Grutler v. Bollinger • U of M’s law school admissions • decision: 5-4 upheld law school’s program • it was applied in a limited & sensible manner and furthered Michigan’s “compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body”. • Affirmative action upheld, but narrow win means it’s not over yet.

  40. The End I know this is a different type of review, but it covers most if not all of the information necessary for Chapter 5 test